To: Truth666
Well, obviously, you're not going to see a given species get pregnant, and give birth to a completely different species.
The human lifetime (and recorded human history, which is only about 6,000 years) is far too short to witness speciation of that nature.
Which, of course, gives rise to the idiocy of young-earth creationism.
39 posted on
02/13/2004 5:44:10 AM PST by
John H K
To: John H K
"you're not going to see a given species get pregnant, and give birth to a completely different species"
I don't mean that. I mean, like in the two cases presented so far (both by Mr. Bird) :
1 - Galapagos finches - geographical isolation would have been the cause for them do diverge from other finches that you still can observe now elsewhere ...
41 posted on
02/13/2004 5:53:56 AM PST by
Truth666
To: John H K
"you're not going to see a given species get pregnant, and give birth to a completely different species"
I don't mean that. I mean, like in the two cases presented so far :
1 - Galapagos finches - geographical isolation would have been the cause for them do diverge from other finches that you still can observe now elsewhere 2 - white colored homo sapiens - moving out from Africa (where you still can observe the "descendants from the ones that dinn't move out") has been the cause of "losing pigmentation"
42 posted on
02/13/2004 5:56:29 AM PST by
Truth666
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson