To: Wneighbor
Yes, that is very pretty. I'm kinda needin' to focus on just useful though - ya know? In case I *need* it. Not a lust factor. :-) But of course... that would be the first one I showed ya. Something in a single-stack magazine with a short barrel, and an alloy frame. Light, small, thin... but still shoots like the dickens.
IMHO... Glock would clean up if they only offered something that didn't require the double-stack magazine. That double-stack grip is just too darn fat for most people and gets in the way of many concealed-carry options.
To: Ramius
But of course... that would be the first one I showed ya. Something in a single-stack magazine with a short barrel, and an alloy frame. Light, small, thin... but still shoots like the dickens. I like that light part too. I will have to check that out. Small and light is good.
Night darlin', I'm ready for bed and going there now. *wink*
10,930 posted on
03/01/2004 8:56:27 PM PST by
Wneighbor
(I got a need for speed and I don't mean the drugstore kind)
To: Ramius
IMHO... Glock would clean up if they only offered something that didn't require the double-stack magazine. That double-stack grip is just too darn fat for most people and gets in the way of many concealed-carry options.Try the Glock 36. Single-stack 6-rd magazine, and tiny. I found the grip too small for my comfort, but others may like it.

11,034 posted on
03/02/2004 11:16:53 AM PST by
300winmag
(FR's Hobbit Hole supports America's troops)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson