Posted on 01/14/2004 5:39:40 AM PST by Jimmyclyde
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:18:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
January 14, 2004 -- DENVER, Colo. - Kobe Bryant's accuser allegedly suffers from bipolar disorder - and may have been in such a "manic state" at the time of the reputed attack that it boosted her sex drive and willingness to bed someone, the defense is charging. The basketball star's legal team, in court papers released yesterday, quotes John Ray Strickland, one of the accuser's ex-love as saying she is bipolar.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Yes, he should have.
Should he have been accused of rape because he didn't?
Ol' HOP learned a very long time ago not to screw crazy women. What's wrong with Kobe?
I guess he be a foo'!
First of all, that's not the case with me.
Without getting into details on what would be debate on statistics, I'd suggest we take a step back and look at the big picture. IMHO, doctors don't know what's going to work - side effects aside, everyone medicates differently, and there's a lot of trial and error. On the results side, there's no evidence these drugs are completely effective. I don't mean that to be a semantic trick - I think there's under-reporting of negative effects.
I think these drugs are pushed (I mean that in a marketing sense - "supply-pushed" as opposed to "demand-pulled") a little too far.
Prozac will do three things for you, (1) decrease condution velocity through the electrical system of the heart (slows the heart beat) , (2) SSRI's are also very affective in treating anxiety disorders (those that might lead to a panic attack). During a panic attack the heart races, in someone with a bad "ticker" you'd want to avoid this the same way you'd want them to avoid wind-sprints, although generally people with panic disorder do NOT have a higher risk of heart attack. The possible problem occurs in people with pre-existing heart dz who have a panic disorder, and (3) will treat the dpression that usually accompanies many disease processes
You're right physicians do not know exactly what will work best, but they do have knowledge of how these drugs work with respect the brain and it's physiology and biochemistry - that's a start. Psych drugs tend to work the same way for most people, but there is generally about a 10% or less cohort that responds not as well or not at all, but this is with newer drugs and fewer side effects, which is the drugs that are a Physician first line of defense. The drugs that work near 100% of the time in all people tend to have the worst side effects, MAOI's for instance. So it is a bit of trial and error for some people, but the drugs with fewest side effects are always tried first.
On the results side, there's no evidence these drugs are completely effective. I don't mean that to be a semantic trick - I think there's under-reporting of negative effects.
Look, when a medicated depressed person comes out of clinical depression months earlier than the folks who do not use medication, there evidence fot effectiveness. When people with OCD can get back to their lives without washing their hand 100 times a day, there is effectiveness. When people who have schizophrenia can stop the voices in their head, there is effectiveness.
Are there side effects? YES! Are these side effects very individual? YES. Can they always be predicted? NO. However, in this area one can statistically evaluate the amount of total side effect manifestation of any given drugs and see which drugs, as a trend, give more and/or worse side effects as compared to others.
I think these drugs are pushed (I mean that in a marketing sense - "supply-pushed" as opposed to "demand-pulled") a little too far.
Perhaps there area few Psych drugs that might fall into this category (I'm not yet a practicing physician, so I have no first-hand knowledge), but I doubt there is a strong push to use stronger psych meds such as the antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and MAOI's.
Absolutely true.
That still doesn't mean it was rape.
Is that suppose to stop the discussion? He may just be innocent, you know.
|
Since you seem to be such an authority on this case, do you mind telling us exactly how he would have known any of that before she went willingly up to his room?
Did she have a sign on her that said "I'm bipolar?"
So, if Kobe's going to fight for his life, either way, one must look to the credibility of the accuser to determine whether KB actually raped her, as she said.
With each revelation from her past, she looks less and less believeable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.