To: PatrickHenry
Equivocation is my guess, although your answer is arguable too, I think.
51 posted on
01/15/2004 11:36:31 AM PST by
general_re
("Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson)
To: general_re
Whatever it was, Russell certainly knew his logic, so if he's guilty of anything it's being a smart-ass. (It was cruel, selecting as an example for this test a piece of irony written by a logician.)
52 posted on
01/15/2004 11:49:23 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Everything good that I have done, I have done at the command of my voices.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson