[Jim Robinson]

Zot happens.

[trussell]

ping

[ETERNAL WARMING]

LibertyForum.com

[martin_fierro]

I am genuinely interested in engaging in dialogue that presents both sides of the political spectrum. If this is not the site for that, can you recommend another?

[martin_fierro]

I am genuinely interested in engaging in dialogue that presents both sides of the political spectrum. If this is not the site for that, can you recommend another?

TRANSLATION:

"I am highly passive-aggressive and hope to link to this thread as proof of what meanies you Conservatives are."

[MotleyGirl70]

Seems like there have been a lot of trolls lurking around FR lately.

[Gil4]

From the posting guidelines: Broadly stated, the goals of this site are to further conservatism, expose political corruption, and recover a truly constitutional form of government. If these are not your goals, you may find another discussion site more suitable.

In other words, don't go away mad. Just go away.

[Darksheare]

"...that liberal viewpoints are not allowed to be expressed here."

What part of "Conservative forum" do you not understand?
Or do you lib types just only understand language when you use it amongst yourselves?
It's already proven that you only uphold rights for your chosen elite, and the rest of us have no rights in your view.

[aliquis]

Note: My opinion only.

This is a conservative forum, however, I shouldn't think, you'd have any problem presenting different - or opposing - views, provided you are not expressing them in confrontational, provocative or hostile manner.

Normally, I prefer to abstain from discussing the fundamentals: these are the trickiest issues, and I'm not qualified enough to confidently argue philosophy, political economy etc.

In a free discussion, all viewpoints will, I think, provide a valuable contribution if conducted in constructive and structured fashion.