If there is not one single nuclear power plant in the world that was dsigned to resist the impact of a 747 at full speed and fuel-full loaded then you don't have to worry about earthquakes ...
Ok ok. Quantitatively, how much more dangerous is Plant Type A vs Plant Type B when a reactor designed in the 70's for a 707 is hit?? I mean, a fully fueled 747 is a pretty GD big disaster on its own!
I just hoped for someone that could point me to some written resources, etc, for me to bone up on. I'm not interested in arguing the merits of nuclear power here.