Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog
"Still I would about as soon have a .22lr as anything less than a 9mm.

I see your point. 22's have their place, IMO. The good Dr's experience proves this; he might have left that little revolver where it was as an afterthought just because it was cheap. (I can't help but wonder if "someone" suggested it to him...) I gave my elderly dad my Taurus .22wmr revolver, and I'm toying with the idea of one of the little .22wmr revolvers from NAA, myself. "Have a gun..."

122 posted on 12/21/2003 7:40:45 PM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: OKSooner
If you get one of the mini revolvers you might as well just get it in .22lr and use shorts in it.

About 15 years ago, a friend of mine had a chronograph and we decided to test one of those with .22 and .22mag cylinders. I think it had a one inch barrel.

Of the 3 the short produced the highest velocity by a small margin and they were all three within a couple of foot pounds of the same energy.

Of course the mag might have killed someone by just the awesome blast.

131 posted on 12/21/2003 7:46:29 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson