Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
While I agree. I think both characters would still be at least be a little older in appearance than they are in movies. Aragorn had traveled most of Middle Earth by the time Fellowship begins. He at least should look somewhat more rugged and care-worn than he does.
17 posted on 12/13/2003 11:01:38 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: BradyLS
Huh.... I think he looks pretty much the 'age' I pictured him.... a man in his prime, but that has been sleepin' outside awhile.

18 posted on 12/13/2003 11:05:55 PM PST by HairOfTheDog (Anyone want some more soup?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS
I think if there is a criticism of the hobbits 'as cast'.... it would be that they are not at all fat.... Even all the weight Sean Astin put on didn't meet the description of round.
19 posted on 12/13/2003 11:07:38 PM PST by HairOfTheDog (Anyone want some more soup?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS
Well, I did some figuring. Aragorn lives to be 210, and is 87 at the time of the War of the Ring, so he is about 41.5% through his lifespan. If the life expectancy of a non-Numenorian is 91 years (using Eomer's lifespan as the baseline), that makes Aragorn the equivalent of a 38 year-old. And Viggo is 45, so I think he is a pretty good fit age-wise.
20 posted on 12/13/2003 11:28:42 PM PST by ecurbh (It's not much, but it's hot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson