OK, LOTR FReeper fans - LET 'ER RIP!!
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Ms. Miller would be better off criticising Mona Lisa Smile starring the vapid and GOP bashing Julia "Big Mouth" (literally) Roberts.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Whoo-boy, another 1,000+ thread.
3 posted on
12/13/2003 12:54:40 PM PST by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I'll be the first Freeper to go out on a limb and admit I don't like the LOTR movies. Perhaps I'd enjoy the books, but to me, the movies are a great example of over dramatic nonsense.
4 posted on
12/13/2003 12:57:12 PM PST by
LanPB01
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Gollum is Carville!

"Trixey . . they took the election, my precious"
5 posted on
12/13/2003 12:57:39 PM PST by
ChadGore
(No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
There is even a theology for Middle Earth; it seems to be basically Zoroastrian in nature*Pseudo-Intellectual Who's Heard A New Word But Doesn't Know What It Means Alert*
First of all, the proper word for the faith is "Zarathustra". "Zoroaster" is a Greek corruption. Secondly, Zarathustrianism is a dualistic theology. Tolkien's theological myth structure is monotheistic - very Catholic, in fact.
To: 2Jedismom; 300winmag; Alkhin; Alouette; ambrose; Anitius Severinus Boethius; artios; AUsome Joy; ...
10 posted on
12/13/2003 1:10:05 PM PST by
ecurbh
(Fire futon torpedo!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
OK, LOTR FReeper fans - LET 'ER RIP!!
I would, if I knew what he ~said~!
11 posted on
12/13/2003 1:13:36 PM PST by
HairOfTheDog
(Please don't break the plates!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Tolkien's high elves are above human naturePresumably the author means elves are incapable of evil. If so, she really ought to reread the Silmarillion. Lots of elves do evil things in it.
14 posted on
12/13/2003 8:41:48 PM PST by
Restorer
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
It seems like she almost answered her own question. Then didn't.
Much of the appeal of LOTR is as the author states: Tolkien's backdrop is so rich in detail and told so beautifully, that its almost as much fun to read as the story itself. In fact, the story grows richer in the telling when you finally mesh the bits and details that Tolkien offers when the trilogy is re-read.
Imagine, for example, a modern story where the principals must travel through Rome to perform a duty. Though the Colesium and other ruins are not in themselves a part of the story being told, the antecedents of the people that built them are now playing out their story among them. And the things that those people who built Rome did in the past DO have an impact on the decisions that our principals must make in the present.
I marvel that all the wonderful tales that Tolkien wanted to share in his own Silmarillion still make their way into becoming a part of the fabric that make Lord of the Rings so captivating.
15 posted on
12/13/2003 10:11:17 PM PST by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson