Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
He would hunt I'm sure. I was being somewhat fascetious there. But he couldn't hunt for very long. Not with the heavy weight on him, not in this climate and terrain. I think the original New Foundland needed that weight and insulation, and a boat dog has less physical demands. Maybe our views are different because of our different locals. I need a dog that can do a day of ducks or geese at long distance in corn fields and in much warmer weather. That dog would not be able to do that for very long. I just think it is wrong that there is no category for conformation that a dog that could do that job might compete for. Two separate categories then? I don't know. :)
8,203 posted on 01/05/2004 9:10:16 AM PST by My back yard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8182 | View Replies ]


To: My back yard
It is when that diversion of 'what people are looking for' happens that new offshoots and new breeds develop. Or the breed changes if the new demand is unanimous, I suppose.

The original Labrador was not bred for upland birds, and those seeking a universal hunting dog that could do that too have changed the Labrador already. And either the standard will change to meet it, or those in duck country will fight for their old Labrador, leaving the upland bird hunters free to choose their own standard for a NewLabrador.
8,206 posted on 01/05/2004 9:15:04 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (There may come a time when the courage of men fails.... but it is not this day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson