[Krodg]

Further, they took heated issue with, including ridiculing, any who argued that since someone definitely did it, and since the evidence pointed to Westerfield, scenarios of how he could have committed the crime held validity.

As it turned out, one of those scenarios was close to the truth.

Which scenario??

[luvbach1]

Which scenario was true? All of this was gone into ad neauseum months ago but obviously some still need to hear it again*. So, in brief, here goes: Westerfield crept into the darkened house, abducted the child, took her into his motor home, drove a circuitus route around San Diego County with her, assaulted her (blood and circumstantial evidence), at some point murdered her, and eventually, dumped her body in rural Descanso. This is the basic scenario the jury believed and upon which they convicted Westerfield. The crime took place, the evidence pointed to Westerfield, the jury convicted him. Anyone asking why he did it, or who wants a more detailed or "truer" account, will not find it for it does not exist. *Only Westerfield knows all that happened (and he is likely in denial), and he's not talking. So please don't ask me.