Well, no, and no.
But first, a clarification:
For my part I did not (knowingly) "shoot down" theories that included westerfield's guilt.
I did (attempt to) point out to all concerned that being accurssed is NOT being convicted.
Further, that there were oddities and conflicts in the reported events (news versus courtroom).
And, that the mommy and daddy were not exactly models of family values.
I still find myself steaming when this or another site start the lynch mob rant over Scott Peterson and, previously, Gary Condit.
I do not know if they, any of them, are or are not guilty but I damn sure do not ever want to be ACCUSED of anything and have it discussed in this forum.
We can discuss the end of days, world hunger, or nuclear war and come away friends, but any mention of scandal or pedophilia (admittedly, the worst crime I can imagine) and somebody gets convicted ten minutes into the debate and those who disagree are asked questions like the one above.
Now, ask me what I think about Michael Jackson.
hint...
Guilty as hell.