[Lady Eileen]

Is not EVERYTHING evolving?

That is a good question, and one molecular biology can probably soon answer.

Recent science has been singular unsuccessful in supplying evidence for any branch of darwinian theory. An excellent book on point is Darwin's Black Box: the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, which shows how recent advances in biology undermine rather than support the hypothesis of evolution.

[donh]

Recent science has been singular unsuccessful in supplying evidence for any branch of darwinian theory. An excellent book on point is Darwin's Black Box: the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, which shows how recent advances in biology undermine rather than support the hypothesis of evolution.

See Miller's "Finding Darwin's God", for an exquisitely detailed tour of all the things Behe predicted could never be published in biological journals due to unreachable complexity--which had already been published before his book went to print. Behe's basic thesis can be fairly summed up like this: "If I can't think how it could have happened, it must be impossible."

[donh]

Recent science has been singular unsuccessful in supplying evidence for any branch of darwinian theory

Huh. Do you suppose the editor's of "Nature" and "Science" and the "Journal of Micro-Biology" and the curators of natural history museums and the Dean's of the colleges of paleontology will be closing up shop soon?

[Kay Soze]

Thank you for the book tip. I will be reading that one for certain.

I do find it whimsical and convenient that species may or may not evolve and or that they may evolve in one area but not another.

They (Darwinists) describe natural selection not evolution.

I would have thought ALL creatures were evolving to advance from the "ooze" to end up walking.

Heck even the constant bombardment of gamma rays should have changed this creature after 450,000,000 years.

Right?