To: Doomed2003
That is enough to make a person sick.
I'd say lets FReep Google.com
2 posted on
12/04/2003 5:39:20 PM PST by
MJY1288
(The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
To: Doomed2003
Calm down. It's the anti- Bush blogger's (note singular) fault. The typed that in so many times when linking to Bush's bio, that that's Google reads it now.
3 posted on
12/04/2003 5:40:04 PM PST by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Pending a review by the Mods, I've bagged three trolls today.)
To: Doomed2003
that really bites the big one...google anti Bush...thats like the dictionary or enclyclopedia being biased against Bush...
sheesh...
4 posted on
12/04/2003 5:40:17 PM PST by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Doomed2003
Try typing in "Google sucks", and clicking on "I'm feeling lucky."
5 posted on
12/04/2003 5:41:08 PM PST by
xJones
To: Doomed2003
I wrote google a few days ago about this. They just sent me the following response:
Thank you for your note about our search results.
The particular case you refer to is the result of the dynamic nature of the Internet and Google's reliance on the web's link structure as part of our search calculation. The order and contents of Google search results are completely automated. No one hand picks a particular result for a given search query. Nor does Google ever insert jokes or send messages by changing the order of results. Occasionally, when a particular website is the subject of public attention, other sites begin linking to it. This may elevate its importance as gauged by our ranking software, which assigns a PageRank value based in part on who links to a given page.
Higher ranking in Google results may lead to more awareness, which may lead to more links and so on. One side effect of not using an editorial viewpoint to determine the ranking of results is that anomalies like this occasionally occur. We view such occasions as opportunities for us to learn more about how the web works and how to improve our algorithms for all searches in the future.
Thanks for taking the time to write to us.
Regards,
The Google Team
7 posted on
12/04/2003 5:42:52 PM PST by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
To: Doomed2003

But Google is where I found this . . .
9 posted on
12/04/2003 5:43:18 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is Slavery)
To: Doomed2003
Just replaced Google with AllTheWeb on my default browser toolbar...
12 posted on
12/04/2003 5:49:02 PM PST by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: Doomed2003
This has been beaten to death. See
here. And
here. And
here.
So there's really no need to get frantic about it.
To: Doomed2003
Doomed2003 aka DUVisitor, FrenchStinkyYuck, TrueAmurican, ProudCon1776, Brainshrub, Masked Conservative, et al, nuked. Again.
Jim
14 posted on
12/04/2003 5:53:02 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: Doomed2003
It probably has nothing to do at all with google. Hits on google are manipulated by folks out there who have broken the code...
15 posted on
12/04/2003 5:56:09 PM PST by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: Doomed2003
Et tu Goggle?
24 posted on
12/04/2003 7:35:34 PM PST by
apackof2
(I won't be satisfied until I am to smart for my own good)
To: Doomed2003
Yawn. Time for a tagline change on your dead thread.
31 posted on
12/04/2003 10:33:25 PM PST by
martin_fierro
(Ohhh... ehhh... ¿Peeka Panish?)
To: Doomed2003
That's a paid for response. Google SOLD that. Type "french military victories" in google and hit "I feel lucky".
32 posted on
12/05/2003 2:58:10 PM PST by
narses
("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Cardinal Arinze of Nigeria)
To: Doomed2003
It's probably the thread originator's blog, and "miserable failure" is in the "keywords" meta tag within the HTML as well as the page itself.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson