[Palladin]

Oy! Give it a rest, already. Many of us never go to the Religion forum, and would thus not see this important warning. If we're really on Red Alert, I'd like to know about it. This knowledge would help me decide which cities I might want to visit in the next few weeks; which mode of travel I would choose; should I check my emergency kits? Fill up the gas tanks? Etc.

It's not fair for the government to tell us little people it's only a Yellow when it's really a Red.

[Quix]

THANKS TONS

for a calm voice of reason.

That's my perspective precisely.

[WackyKat]

Many of us never go to the Religion forum, and would thus not see this important warning

Exactly. Draw the obvious conclusion

Having made my point, I say, Good Night to all-must sleep off leftovers!

[Quix]

Here's my query regarding it being moved to the religion forum:

Jim, You are the boss. If you care to enlighten me on this issue, great. To me, Red "Behind the scenes" alert level vs yellow public one was VERY SUFFICIENT reason to post it as extended news and for it to be kept there. The religious aspect of the source's commentary was a whole other matter, IMHO.

To: Lead Moderator

THE FOLLOWING IS RE:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1030525/posts

---

Could you tell me the criteria for moving such a post to religion?

There was no other post mentioning the important news aspect that I could find under search.

If the rabidly-hostile-to-God/religion only have to complain to get a post moved to religion, IMHO, that is a very sorry state of affairs akin to PC in the Nation at large.

We shall see if anything comes of this warning.

If something dreadful does come related to such events outlined in my post . . .

And FREEPERS GET HURT because they failed to know they should have gone to religion to have read of the warning, at least their blood will not be on my hands.

Is it REALLY in FR's best interests to follow Shrillary's, Boxerface's, Abzug's, Ted Turner's standards so closely on such matters? I thought we were quite on the other side of such PC issues! I thought THEY were on one side of THEIR RUBBER CONSTITUTION and we were on the other of the SOLID CONSTITUTION!

If FR is serious about moving all hint of God or fitting relgion perspectives of news events out of the public square--as the Ted Turners and Shrilleries of the Globalists world sucking up to other court rulings demand, then I'd like to know about it. And I'd like to understand the rationale.