Replies

Fascinating explanation and I have no reason to consider it less than plausible.

Given that:

Associated Press; WorldNetDaily.com, by Paul Sperry, Washington Bureau Chief, 11/24/03

Was early in the document--and I HAD TRIED to put that whole bit in the SOURCE slot--but it kept deleting major portions of it and I gave up other than getting the Bureau Chief's name in there with Francis'

But given that line--clearly listing a Washington Bureau Chief of the Assoc Press as a source for a key part . . . what on earth happened in brain synapses to flush that so wholesale REGARDLESS of the rest of the document?

Have people in this country forgotten how to spit out the bones at all?????????????????????????!

And it wasn't even bones, the rest of it--but from their perpsective, if they considered it bones, spit them out and hold on to the Assoc Press part.

WHAT WAS SO IRRATIONALLY DIFFICULT ABOUT THAT????

SHEESH.

Thanks much for your patient explanation. But it presents a mystifying picture of very strange thought processes, to me . . . no layman in terms of knowledge about thought processes.