Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
I'm not committed one way or the other, but would it have been possible to make Buzz Aldrin and the (nowadays habitually silent) Neil Armstrong THINK they traveled to the Moon even if they didn't?

Uh, no. There is no technology that creates sustained low gravity on Earth.

51 posted on 11/19/2003 4:25:22 PM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Sloth
If the folks who knew how to make such a hypothetical technology let it become known, plenty of government bureaucrats and contractors would be out of billions that they still get for sending folks on the Space Shuttle. NASA's budget's over $15 billion annually. If human spaceflight ended, many think NASA's science budget would be substantially depleted because voters and taxpayers would care far less about space. So there does appear to be an economic incentive to keep certain technologies hush hush. Or maybe Neil's so quiet for a reason. In other countries, folks who can be blackmailed are allowed to get ahead because the blackmailing serves as their leash...
57 posted on 11/19/2003 4:32:50 PM PST by Analyzing Inconsistencies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Sloth
I should add that "microgravity research" is still considered to be a major justification for sending humans into space despite how NASA does it nearly 30 times more expensively than the Russians do, and with a far less impressive safety record too. If zero gravity's obtainable here on Earth, you can imagine how certain vested interests would be substantially threatened.
59 posted on 11/19/2003 4:34:25 PM PST by Analyzing Inconsistencies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson