What it takes to get banned from FR? (Vanity)

None | Today | CSM

[CSM]

Given the rumors and speculation regarding banning of individuals from FR, I took the suggestion of another poster to start a thread around the topic. I have gone back and reread the rules and the specific speculation of posting to one type of thread or posting one type of article only is not called out as against the rules.

So, outside of the rules, what constitutes being banned or suspended from posting on FR?

[CSM]

There wasn't any official "hand off", but I do realize that you are making that comment lightly......Yes, I am interested in claims from both standpoints and when a claim is valid I can accept it.

[robertpaulsen]

"He's already been back at least three times."

The running tote is now four: Jack Cole

[CWOJackson]

For someone who doesn't use dope and doesn't receive any funding for his efforts, he sure is tenacious in getting back in to post his Soros propaganda.

Kind of strange that he would continue sneaking back in even while his friends are begging clemency for him. I don't know why he was ousted the first time but his continual distain for this site by trying to sneak in...and lying about it...probably don't help his chances of coming back a whole lot.

[John Beresford Tipton]

"nope, I know this leroy...
he got so hateful in one post that I quoted the bible from Peter saying that you should explain plainly and clearly what you believe, and he didn't even recognize the quote."

Well, you should have no trouble finding this hateful post, check in your "comments. You make such a big do about all his hateful posts that you recall and how you objected, see gathered for your convenience in post 77.

I suggest that you put up or shut up.
Your inability to back up claims that only you appear to be making appears to indicate that you are full of [medical term deleted, but don't step in it please}.

[CWOJackson]

"but his language has been outside the bounds of polite discussion in the past..."

There were times when he could have taken lessons for your latest fan here...or maybe he did.

[jmc813]

I Google searched all of Leroy's posts having to do with Catholicism. Results can be found at http://www.google.com/search?q=site:freerepublic.com+%22MrLeroy%22+catholic&num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&output=search.

In all of these, Leroy was quite pro-Catholic. The only time he was remotely critical was of priests and bishops who opposed the Iraq war.

Perhaps you are mixing him up since he did argue with people with blatent anti-Catholic biases?

[Lazamataz]

What does it take to get banned from Free Republic?

This post should just about do it.

[CWOJackson]

So how many aliases are we currently up to?

leroy

the coach

goddess

groob

Anita Bhanghet

Jack Cole

Am I missing any?

[John Beresford Tipton]

In a recent episode of ER a doctor who had a arm that had to be amputed because it was chopped up by a helicopter took the precaution before surgery of writing "NOT THIS ARM" on his good arm. At the time I thought that was an over reaction. Having encountered LadyDoc I am convicned he was being prudent, but then perhaps *He* will be the next to be accused by a deranged person of postings that weren't his (using his good arm, presumptively)

[jmc813]

You're a lot better on threads where you're defending "conservative" Arnold.

[CWOJackson]

LOL!

Is that leroy's latest name?

[jmc813]

LadyDoc seems to be a reasonable person. I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt that she has mixed up LeRoy with someone else due to his involvment in heated Catholicism threads. Lord knows, I've made similar mistakes before.

[jmc813]

What do you mean?

[CWOJackson]

I think the real question is "What do you mean?"

Where have I been defending California's governor?

[CWOJackson]

Alright. Leory is "true advocate" this morning.

[jmc813]

Where have I been defending California's governor?

Earlier, you were dissing my boy McClintock for speaking out against R-nold's bond proposal, so I assume you agree with it. I also assume you agree with Arnold living-Consitution interperetation of the 2nd Amendment?

[CWOJackson]

LOL! I was only pointing out McButtocks sour grapes. LOL! Leave it an lp'ers to try and make that into an issue.

So I see leroy is trying to sneak in as true advocate this morning.

[jmc813]

I'm glad to see you've finally seen the light and support a literal interperetation of the 2nd Amendment.

[CWOJackson]

LOL! Trying to dodge again? It's about as successful as this thread.

[robertpaulsen]

Wouldn't the really offensive posts have already been removed by the mods?