Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What it takes to get banned from FR? (Vanity)
None | Today | CSM

Posted on 11/18/2003 10:20:36 AM PST by CSM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last
To: robertpaulsen
There wasn't any official "hand off", but I do realize that you are making that comment lightly......Yes, I am interested in claims from both standpoints and when a claim is valid I can accept it.
101 posted on 11/20/2003 5:38:52 AM PST by CSM (Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
"He's already been back at least three times."

The running tote is now four: Jack Cole

102 posted on 11/20/2003 6:06:48 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
For someone who doesn't use dope and doesn't receive any funding for his efforts, he sure is tenacious in getting back in to post his Soros propaganda.

Kind of strange that he would continue sneaking back in even while his friends are begging clemency for him. I don't know why he was ousted the first time but his continual distain for this site by trying to sneak in...and lying about it...probably don't help his chances of coming back a whole lot.

103 posted on 11/20/2003 6:31:58 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
"nope, I know this leroy...
he got so hateful in one post that I quoted the bible from Peter saying that you should explain plainly and clearly what you believe, and he didn't even recognize the quote."

Well, you should have no trouble finding this hateful post, check in your "comments. You make such a big do about all his hateful posts that you recall and how you objected, see gathered for your convenience in post 77.

I suggest that you put up or shut up.
Your inability to back up claims that only you appear to be making appears to indicate that you are full of [medical term deleted, but don't step in it please}.
104 posted on 11/20/2003 7:36:01 AM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
"but his language has been outside the bounds of polite discussion in the past..."

There were times when he could have taken lessons for your latest fan here...or maybe he did.

105 posted on 11/20/2003 8:12:52 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc; John Beresford Tipton
I Google searched all of Leroy's posts having to do with Catholicism. Results can be found at http://www.google.com/search?q=site:freerepublic.com+%22MrLeroy%22+catholic&num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&output=search.

In all of these, Leroy was quite pro-Catholic. The only time he was remotely critical was of priests and bishops who opposed the Iraq war.

Perhaps you are mixing him up since he did argue with people with blatent anti-Catholic biases?

106 posted on 11/20/2003 8:29:07 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CSM
What does it take to get banned from Free Republic?

This post should just about do it.

107 posted on 11/20/2003 8:38:28 AM PST by Lazamataz (I like my women as I like my coffee: Cold and bitter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
So how many aliases are we currently up to?

leroy

the coach

goddess

groob

Anita Bhanghet

Jack Cole

Am I missing any?

108 posted on 11/20/2003 8:45:00 AM PST by CWOJackson (This will be the President's undoing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; LadyDoc
In a recent episode of ER a doctor who had a arm that had to be amputed because it was chopped up by a helicopter took the precaution before surgery of writing "NOT THIS ARM" on his good arm. At the time I thought that was an over reaction. Having encountered LadyDoc I am convicned he was being prudent, but then perhaps *He* will be the next to be accused by a deranged person of postings that weren't his (using his good arm, presumptively)
109 posted on 11/20/2003 8:54:04 AM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
You're a lot better on threads where you're defending "conservative" Arnold.
110 posted on 11/20/2003 9:03:21 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
LOL!

Is that leroy's latest name?

111 posted on 11/20/2003 9:04:58 AM PST by CWOJackson (This will be the President's undoing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
LadyDoc seems to be a reasonable person. I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt that she has mixed up LeRoy with someone else due to his involvment in heated Catholicism threads. Lord knows, I've made similar mistakes before.
112 posted on 11/20/2003 9:05:01 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
What do you mean?
113 posted on 11/20/2003 9:05:35 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
I think the real question is "What do you mean?"

Where have I been defending California's governor?

114 posted on 11/20/2003 9:06:43 AM PST by CWOJackson (This will be the President's undoing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Alright. Leory is "true advocate" this morning.
115 posted on 11/20/2003 9:09:52 AM PST by CWOJackson (This will be the President's undoing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Where have I been defending California's governor?

Earlier, you were dissing my boy McClintock for speaking out against R-nold's bond proposal, so I assume you agree with it. I also assume you agree with Arnold living-Consitution interperetation of the 2nd Amendment?

116 posted on 11/20/2003 9:12:00 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
LOL! I was only pointing out McButtocks sour grapes. LOL! Leave it an lp'ers to try and make that into an issue.

So I see leroy is trying to sneak in as true advocate this morning.

117 posted on 11/20/2003 9:15:29 AM PST by CWOJackson (This will be the President's undoing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I'm glad to see you've finally seen the light and support a literal interperetation of the 2nd Amendment.
118 posted on 11/20/2003 9:16:30 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
LOL! Trying to dodge again? It's about as successful as this thread.
119 posted on 11/20/2003 9:51:48 AM PST by CWOJackson (This will be the President's undoing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Wouldn't the really offensive posts have already been removed by the mods?
120 posted on 11/20/2003 10:18:45 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson