To: Yo-Yo
Van der Worp further argued that this fission reaction might well initiate a much larger thermonuclear fusion reaction in the deuterium (heavy hydrogen) making up a significant percentage of Jupiters atmosphere ultimately, igniting Jupiter as the solar systems second sun! And just where did this retard get his degree ..... the nuclear batteries are U-238, NOT 235 and not plutonium.
18 posted on
11/07/2003 9:44:59 AM PST by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
To: Centurion2000
And just where did this retard get his degree ..... the nuclear batteries are U-238, NOT 235 and not plutonium.Actually, they ARE plutonium.
But the idea that there's enough oomph there to create a runaway burn a la Teller's "Classical Super" is downright silly. There's a reason that the Classical Super wouldn't work: the device would radiate away the heat of the nuclear blast before it could raise the thermonuclear fuel to the ignition point.
23 posted on
11/07/2003 9:49:47 AM PST by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Centurion2000
And just where did this retard get his degree ..... the nuclear batteries are U-238, NOT 235 and not plutonium. Actually, they're PLUTONIUM-238. See here for facts about Galileo's RTGs.
As for the "implosion" thing -- it's completely bogus. A plutonium bomb requires very precise compression, and very high implosion speeds. Atmospheric crushing would be uneven, and very slow.
26 posted on
11/07/2003 9:52:02 AM PST by
r9etb
To: Centurion2000
The spacecraft carried several pounds of plutonium packaged in small pieces so there would be no danger of a critical mass in case the launch were aborted.
40 posted on
11/07/2003 10:10:20 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson