To: liz44040
I would expect nothing less from the jihadist composers of that image.
Osama is their log-awaited "Mahdi" after all.
And besides, Osama's choppers are not a key ingredient in the image.
The "frogman" is, and the association of "water" or "waterborne" assault is.
To: All
OK, gang..who here thinks that the 2/1 - 2/4 nuke threat against NYC is real? And who thinks it is psyops or just wild 'net BB posts?
Also - I can't decipher homelandsecurity.com for the life of me. They put up different things that don't neccessarily seem related, and don't clearly indicate what threat is from which site or AQ statement, etc. So, you read pieces and parts of it, and come away with a "general" feeling that there are many threats, but have no way to get a good handle on their validity or what exactly was said - by whom, when and where.
I'm aware of MERI's interpretation of recent statements and Website postings, but what do you guys all think the "real" threat is at this point?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson