Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hchutch
"1. That's your opinion - my understanding was Mr. Timberlake blabbed about it, so she didn't have much choice."

You must real be hard up to be such a stauch advocate of a slut. She was so stupid as to not see all he was doing was using her as the object she willingly portrays herself as - a cat in heat.

"2. And who defines smut? Hustler is smut. Playboy is smut. Penthouse is smut. Britney Spears is NOT smut. You might have your moral boundaries, but I would appreciate it if you do not impose them on me. I resent it when the Left does it, and I won't give the Right a free pass for it, either."

You'll have to play your Clintonesque games with someone else. That is beneath me. As for your pitting of the left against the right ... YAWN and then "imposing my boundaries on you ... LOL. You're in the same boat as the slut. You simply don't get it.

"3. That's your opinion, although the way you express it leads me to believe Ms. Spears has more class than you do."

Not an opinion. An obvious fact. Dresses like a slut, acts like a slut and sleeps around. Maybe you ought to define what "class" is since you wouldn't know it if it hit you in the head. From you though, I take that as a complement since what you believe has class, is not at all what I's associate with much less emulate.

"4. You sure could have fooled me with your previous comments."

I think you just like to list childish replies. I have no clue on what this utterance is about. Most likely you don't either.

57 posted on 10/27/2003 7:04:47 PM PST by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: nmh
You must real be hard up to be such a stauch advocate of a slut. She was so stupid as to not see all he was doing was using her as the object she willingly portrays herself as - a cat in heat.
So

Clintoning

What?

If it bothers you that much, turn of the TV/radio and don't buy her CDs. Or are you one of those people who thinks that your definition of "morality" should be enforced by law? If you aren't, what's the point of going over-the-top like you have?

The fact is she could strip it all off and do stuff ten times worse than she does in her videos, and she wouldn't be even one tenth as dangerous as people who believe that their own pet peeves on cultural matters constitute natural law and need to be enforced...."for our own good" of course. Such is the thinking of the Taliban, and IMO more than a few "cultural conservatives".

-Eric

58 posted on 10/28/2003 3:10:50 AM PST by E Rocc (If Muslims "hate America", why do returning troops all say most Iraqi civilians welcomed them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: nmh; Poohbah; Catspaw; E Rocc; PJ-Comix
1. Again, none of your business. I happen to think that there are far worse problems in this country than Britney Spears showing a little skin and admitting she isn't a virgin.

2. You're right - I don't get how some people want to impose their moral code on the rest of us using big govenrment tactics. I really don't.

3. You have no proof that she sleeps around. Again, it leads me to think she has more class than you.

If Britney Spears showing some skin and admitting she, as a single 21-year-old woman has sex is such a problem for you, why don't you move to Saudi Arabia? They don't have any of that stuff there. You'll have to give up a few of the freedoms we have here, but that ought to be no problem for you...
60 posted on 10/28/2003 5:43:57 AM PST by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson