Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/11/2003 5:33:19 PM PDT by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Commander8
here we go again..

the womb obsessive crowd will abort themselves well before they ever get elected..

what good will it do if one is not in power to influence?

would this same crowd vote for ronnie in 1966? that's the real question.
2 posted on 08/11/2003 6:12:17 PM PDT by FRgal4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commander8
Guess what.. I don't think this should turn into a RELIGIOUS battle. That is a HUGE mistake to make.

IF Sheldon asks McClintock at the same time he is asking Schwarzenegger that's one thing, but no ambushing. I'm sick of this kind of hypocritical ambushing by holier than thou judgemental repubs.

3 posted on 08/11/2003 7:02:09 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commander8
The fine Reverand should ask the same of the churches first.

1. Why do you support gays in the high prtiesthood?

2. Why do you elect known gays to be Protestant Bishops?

This is like NAMBLA calling the kettle black.

Is it any wonder that Catholics vote Democratic?
5 posted on 08/11/2003 8:03:13 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commander8
I almost posted this letter when it appeared in my inbox. Generally, whenever I see anything that Rev Lou Sheldon disapproves of, I re-examine the issue or person to see how I can like them.

I'm not sure if Rev Sheldon's missive on Schwarzenegger being no Reagan is somewhere on FR, but I think his comments there indicate how far in the dark he is... Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition, said today Arnold Schwarzenegger would create a "moral vacuum" in Sacramento if he became California's governor.

As if there wasn't already a moral vaccum there...
6 posted on 08/11/2003 8:32:33 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commander8
I for one would like the answers to these questions, and a number of others.

There is plenty of reason to believe that Schwarzenegger holds Christians, conservatives and traditional values in derision.

I don't see a single legitimate reason for anyone who cares about that to vote for the man.

The fact he has chosen to put an 'R' behind his name doesn't suffice.
8 posted on 08/11/2003 11:57:23 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commander8
They missed a couple of moral questions.

For example, "Is it moral to NOT downsize the State Government when there is a spending deficit?"

"Is it moral to ask the voters to pay higher taxes to fund programs that increase the deficit, and thus require future higher taxes?"
12 posted on 08/12/2003 9:09:32 PM PDT by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commander8

2002: Arnold, Buffett meet with Rothschilds, other elites

Reuters, Sept. 24, 2002:
WADDESDON MANOR, England (Reuters) - The world's second-richest man dropped into the English countryside with the Terminator at his side on Monday, a day after warning the UK's corporate big game his elephant gun was loaded.

Billionaire Warren Buffett and mean machine Arnold Schwarzenegger touched down by helicopter on the immaculate lawns of Waddesdon manor, a Renaissance-style chateau in the undulating hills of Buckinghamshire.

Buffett, 72, is guest of honor at a closed two-day meeting of some of the world's most powerful businessmen and financiers -- the ultimate networking opportunity.

The get-together in the ancestral home of the Rothschild banking family will discuss economic and political issues
[...]
Among those invited to Waddesdon Manor were the likes of James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank, Jorma Ollila, chief executive of Nokia and De Beers chairman Nicky Oppenheimer.
[...]
A group of photographers captured the moment when Buffett and Schwarzenegger, resplendent in steel-tipped cowboy boots, stepped onto Waddesdon's freshly cut lawn to be greeted by Lord Jacob Rothschild. . .
30 posted on 08/18/2003 2:27:23 PM PDT by comnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commander8
Is Lou Sheldon on Gray Davis's payroll? If Arnold Schwarzeneger's campaign falters, it's Gray Davis who benefits. Bill Simon, the Rev. Sheldon's choice in 2002, waged such a dumb campaign that he guaranteed Davis's reelection. We have to face the truth: California is not a conservative state. You don't like it, and I don't like it, but it's the fact and we have to work with that. People who always take an all-or-nothing approach usually wind up with nothing. Whatever Schwarzeneger's imperfections are, he's far preferable to Gray Davis.
43 posted on 08/24/2003 11:45:55 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Better to have half than nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson