CMG ISSUES 10 QUESTIONS THAT MAKE SCHWARZENEGGER HIDE

Californians For Moral Government-email | August 11, 2003 | James Lafferty

[=Intervention=]

And the relevance to this topic is....*tapping foot, waiting*
Or is this the precursor to another round of adjective vitriol? (When you can't fight the rationales of your opponents, name-call and "out" them?)

[=Intervention=]

Ok, so you admit you'd never heard of the guy until he filed. So most other people you had talked to hadn't either. Again, so what? Your study isn't scientific nor wide-ranging I imagine, so what does it prove? It proves that his advertising campaign hadn't gotten to you, yet, is all. And I really see nothing wrong with anyone (even those people YOU hadn't heard of) running for public office. The converse of that is a bit silly, don't you think? (And how many people advertise before they file? Hint: not many!)

[Clintonfatigued]

Is Lou Sheldon on Gray Davis's payroll? If Arnold Schwarzeneger's campaign falters, it's Gray Davis who benefits. Bill Simon, the Rev. Sheldon's choice in 2002, waged such a dumb campaign that he guaranteed Davis's reelection. We have to face the truth: California is not a conservative state. You don't like it, and I don't like it, but it's the fact and we have to work with that. People who always take an all-or-nothing approach usually wind up with nothing. Whatever Schwarzeneger's imperfections are, he's far preferable to Gray Davis.

[Commander8]

I'll vote my pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun conscience.