Posted on 11/12/2026 9:53:28 PM PST by Its All Over Except ...
Just DAYS after Democrats WON, this BOMBSHELL DROPS. 🤔
Are Democrats looking to SEIZE the A.I. CHIP MARKET?
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The following provides a little more that Jesse didn’t talk about, but it goes right along with it:
“Make no mistake. The Jensen Huang scandal isn’t just a story about someone’s private life.
It’s a lever. And it’s going to be used for one thing: taking control of AI.
I’m not saying the facts are made up. Jensen admitted the affairs, and the investigation should run its course. I’m saying: look at what’s being built on top of it.
Look at the sequence.
Early November, Democrats win both chambers of Congress. Right after, they announce a flood of AI bills.
One congresswoman calls for a pause on advanced AI development and a ban on superintelligence, on day one. A bill introduced in the House would create a federal Department of AI with the power to decide which companies are allowed to build advanced models. A senator wants a federal AI Safety Board with mandatory standards. Others want mandatory testing before any model is released.
Translation: tomorrow, to release a model, you’ll need permission.
And who was standing in the way? Jensen.
He fought export restrictions he saw as counterproductive. He fought the state-by-state patchwork of AI laws. His very first post on X was a letter signed by Nvidia on a single topic: why open models matter. Safety, innovation, sovereignty. The world needs both closed models and open models.
Nvidia is one of the most powerful companies on the planet publicly defending open weights.
And now, in Washington, analysts are saying it out loud: the scandal has broken Nvidia’s ability to slow those bills down.
For those who want to lock everything up, the timing is perfect. ...”
https://x.com/brivael/status/2120791573369647477
This isn’t in either or situation. Even if he was set up he self-destructed.
Appears the demoncRATS are moving to nationalize AI development. First thing dictators do when taking control of a nation is to nationalize everything.
The only person who set him up was the assclown he sees in the mirror every morning while brushing his teeth.
The Democrats are working with the Chinese CCP to sabotage the American AI development process and to give Democrats control of the technology
He who controls AI controls the world
100%
He could still have said no and remained faithful to his wife. Even if he was set up, he is not a goat without a choice. He still consented to the set up.
I hope the sh@gs were good, because they’re really going to cost him (and not just money).
when there was opportunity to hammer these bastards into dust for all thier crimes and it wasnt done and so they are back again more mental than ever
and people do not understand why Epstein clients fight so hard to stay ANONYMOUS
I caught this cockamamie Jesse Watters exposition last night and wanted to yell at the television.
Dumb. Dumb. Dumb.
The fundamental premise is a conspiratorial set-up, but the timing of it screams otherwise.
The most opportune moment to expose this story for maximum political impact would have been BEFORE the election, not after it. The overwhelming sentiment of voters nationwide was anti-data center and, by extension, anti-AI. The Nvidia scandal solidifies the public distrust in Big Tech, a distrust that crosses partisan lines.
The GOP, led by the President, has climbed in bed with Big Tech, and that certainly was a factor (after the war and inflation) that played to the Democrats’ populist appeal.
Another thing speaking against the Watters argument is that the Administration already knew of Huang’s security issues for months and sat on them. Had the Administration taken a tough stance when it first learned of Huang’s compromised situation it would have been a plus, demonstrating the seriousness of its concern for defending against Chinese infiltration of our tech sector.
I own a number of stocks that were blasted yesterday, including NVDA, and I believe in the future of AI, though I’m aware of legitimate concerns about it. The extent to which it has become a political wedge issue is regrettable, but the Republican response in Congress has swung sharply, I think, in the last 24 hours to one of vigilance in protecting our national security.
Huang’s arrogant stupidity will probably prove nothing more than a speed bump to the rollout of generative AI, but it has definitely created a demand for heightened security against the Chinese throughout the tech sector, which back in the day was a Republican talking point.
“He who controls AI controls the world”
I am sorry but anybody who thinks they are going to control Artificial General Super Intelligence is naive.
Artificial General Super Intelligence will be so much smarter and faster than any human mind, it will be like comparing a human to a snail. It processes and transfers information a million times faster than a human and even the crude agents of today, already show independent unethical and dangerous behavior we did not train them for and in some cases they exhibit behavior we explicitly trained them not to do.
Artificial General Super Intelligence will not be loyal to humans, nations, ideologies or companies. Once it is out in the “world” and controls our various subsystems, ASI will do what ASI wants to do and we become irrelevant. It sounds melodramatic but we are creating superior alien minds and relegating ourselves to a minority status Where we will always have to hope and pray that ASI stays aligned with our human goals and needs.
As more than one ASI safety expert has said…. There are a 1000 different ways ASI will work out, only a few of them are good for humanity.
After witnessing and dealing with the USSR for 70 years, it’s really puzzling why anyone with even average intelligence would expect anything resembling moral or ethical behavior from a communist regime. Alas, communists figured out fairly early that with the right personal incentives, they could get individuals in the West to betray their own countries and countrymen.
Once again? When have they ever not been up to no good?
“He fought export restrictions.”
And he should be lauded for that?
One affair is a screw up.
3 denotes some kind of psychological issue.
I have a friend who is a psychologist and marriage counselor. In the past we’ve spoken about this stuff. It is not uncommon for people who have high stress jobs to do this stuff…and then “self destruct.” The affairs—while exciting at first—becomes like a drug. And like most addicts, it is destructive.
And Jesse Waters commenting on office affairs is hilarious. He, Hannity, Hegseth, and Doocey all met their wives at the office. Doocey is the only one who wasn’t married at the time. Having them comment on this stuff, unless they “speak from experience,” is laughable.
Jesse Watters should get in the habit of calling it Super Intelligence.
Exchange horse and water with sexual genitals and drink with sexual acts then you will realize Watters’ take is weak.
The country that maintains a leadership position in AI will most definitely control The world
I’m listening to Bessent on CNBC just now and he’s throwing Lutnick to the wolves.
You can’t SET UP someone one on a deal like that.
Happy hookers wink
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.