Posted on 10/08/2026 5:10:58 AM PDT by DFG

There are tens of thousands of foreign academics in this country. Many of them hate us. And do whatever malicious mischief they can.
Take Guangtian Ha, an assistant professor of religion at Haverford College and Chinese Muslim scholar, is now accused of pretending to be a Groyper using an X account named ‘America1st’ to send antisemitic death threats. It makes me wonder how many of these trolls all over X, pretending to be American admirers of Hitler are some Chinese or Pakistani troll with a PhD.
(Incidentally, we’ve got a fairly sophisticated troll of this variety operating on our site who regularly swaps user names, comes on as reasonable before showing his agenda. Since we’ve gotten some complaints about him. Yes, we know about it.)
“Again and again and again. Spare not a single one of the jew rats,” he said in response to a post marking Holocaust Remembrance Day.
“We will never forget what the fuhrer did. In fact, we are studying it meticulously, so we don’t make the same mistake this time round, so no a single one of you is left,” he offered in another Holocaust Remembrance Day post.
“The jews are angry because the world has woken up and realized Hitler was right all along,” Ha said in February 2026.
Guangtian Ha is a Chinese immigrant, yet he tried to sound like some domestic Neo-Nazi. He also praised Tucker Carlson.
“We will make sure each jew is kicked out of our country. You will miss Hitler for what is about to happen, satan-worshipping jew,” he told Israeli journalist Haviv Rettig Gur.
He didn’t get in trouble for this. This is academia after all. But he allegedly directed threats at a colleague and that’s illegal. For now.
Investigators said the most troubling post happened on Monday, just one day before Ha’s arrest, when he made a post telling the victim to send their kids outside to play.
Probably won’t be long though before New York Magazine runs an article titled ‘Professor Arrested for Criticizing Israel’.
Did Haverford have plenty of warning about Ha? Obviously. He was a member of Faculty for Justice in Palestine (FJP) and co-authored an op-ed and claimed that Jewish complaints were “attacks on our anti-Zionist Jewish community members” and then complained about “the plight of Muslim, Arab, Black, and Brown students on campus, who have, as we allude to above, spent decades feeling silenced and alienated on the subject of Palestine.” Online, Ha appeared to be using a ‘Goyim’ account which loved using the N word.
Students had complained about Ha before. “Between August 15 and August 19, 2024, Professor Guangtian Ha, an associate professor of Religion, authored a series of incendiary and obscene posts attacking Plaintiffs and any other Jew committed to Israel. In one post, Ha advised that “the only way to deal with Zionists”—presumably including his students—”is to stop talking to them and refuse to let them waste your time.” In another post, Professor Ha said: “Anyone who says ‘what about Hamas’ can go f*** themself.” In yet another post, Professor Ha opined: “By this point matter is no longer just ceasefire. The state of Israel must be dismantled and the society de-Nazified. Arms embargo, sanction, boycott, attack Zionism on all fronts. Zionism is Nazism, it is fascism. Zionists are racists.”
Now we know what was under the mask.

Thanks for posting. If he’s true to his religion, Ha Ha’s first allegiance is Islam. China has its own problems with these MoFos. Perhaps they know best how to deal with them to preserve their civilization.
Temu Hitler should be sent back to Chy-na for a full refund.
Quick question for the school: Would this professor still be on staff if he was making similar terroristic threats against black people?
MacArthur publicly criticized Truman’s policies, advocated for bombing communist China, and communicated directly with political leaders like House Republican Joseph Martin to push for total victory in Asia.
During the Korean War, General Douglas MacArthur proposed using atomic bombs against Chinese forces and industrial areas, which contributed to his public clash and firing by President Harry S. Truman.
MacArthur proposed dropping roughly 30 to 34 atomic bombs on Chinese supply lines and air bases in Manchuria.
The “Cobalt Belt”: He suggested laying a radioactive belt of cobalt across the neck of the Korean Peninsula (from the Sea of Japan to the Yellow Sea) to block future northern land invasions.
President Harry S. Truman should have listened to General Douglas MacArthur; instead, he relieved MacArthur of his command on April 11, 1951. Truman relieved MacArthur of his command for public insubordination and challenging civilian control of the military
Most people don’t know that Hillary Clinton was on the Board of Directors of Walmart, headquartered in Arkansas where Bill was Governor at the time.
This is why Walmart funded Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, even flying Bill on Walmart planes during the primary.
Bill then gave China most favored nation trading status and Walmart recruited companies to move their manufacturing to China.
The Clinton’s really hurt this country.
I heard a commencement address in 1985 in which the speaker encouraged people to shop at Wal-Mart because they didn’t buy things from China.
Sam Walton ran a big marketing campaign promoting “Buy American.” Sam died in 1992 and things changed drastically after that.
A mutual friend went into Walmart, saw all the imported goods, and called Sam personally to complain. He told me that Sam was apologetic as he had backed away from day to day activities.
A Chinese Muslim in the USA is by definition a confused person
The founder of the company Acxiom was also a big supporter of the Clinton’s. I worked with Acxiom back in the 90s for an insurance company. back then it was amazing how much info they had on people and Walmart is their largest customer.
They brought their system in, asked someone in the presentation crowd to volunteer for them to use their system to look them up. They knew how much the lady & her husband made, cars they owned and value of their house.
I asked them how they got all this info & they said, have you ever wondered why a $25 toaster warranty, they ask about your salary? They said you’d be amazed at how truthful people are on those surveys. Plus they used other 3rd party to enhance the data including census data.
This was in the early 90s!! After that, I’ve been careful of what I share publicly. With AI, it’ll be worse.
I bought a pair of glasses at Walmart that broke after a couple of days & they said I was SOL. Wrote a letter to Walmart management & not only did I get a different, new pair of glasses, they refunded my $$ because they knew via Acxiom that if I left, they’d lose more than the cost of the glasses.
Thank you for sharing that story/information.
I’ve been a CPA/Fraud Investigator/Litigation Strategist for about fifty years. I found it amazing, the amount of information available on people prior to computers. Now people are an open book.
I always followed a policy of not saying or doing anything in private that I would not say/do in public. That included telephone conversations. Integrity is like virginity, you can only lose it once.
I’m working on a big divorce case right now where my client is divorcing her cheating husband who is a venture capitalist, on the BOD of over seventy corporations. There are so many tricks to hide assets through shell corporations, friends/family, and offshore accounts that it is a nightmare trying to find hidden assets, in this case worth many millions. This is where I use all the public information as a tool.
After years of being cross examined on the stand as an expert witness, You don’t want skeletons in your closet. They will shackle you. That is why I stayed away from drugs, affairs and politics, the three primary poisons to a career.
The problem I see in today’s free information society is twofold.
First, people use the information to try to manipulate you, both consciously and subconsciously. After all these years, and working on so many divorce cases, my knowledge about people’s embarrassing secrets is great. I have used that knowledge as a strategy, knowing that legal opposition would sooner give away everything, rather than risk it being brought to the public light in a courtroom. People will preserve their ego over their tangible assets. Asking for the right information in discovery is most important to settle prior to the courtroom.
Second, is the ability of malicious people to plant fake evidence. I’m pretty savvy at protecting my computers, being careful to not open unknown emails or attachments, never allowing porn sites to be accessed on my computers, (0thers often use my computers in the office), and staying away from fishing websites. It’s really tough to stay protected, and I realize it’s an odds game, where I pray the criminals don’t find this needle in the haystack.
You might enjoy this article:
“The Clintons Have an Old Friend in Data Giant Acxiom”
https://adage.com/article/campaign-trail/clintons-friend-data-giant-acxiom/306603/
• Shared Origins: Acxiom—a major consumer data broker and marketing technology company—and Bill and Hillary Clinton both built their early foundations in Little Rock.
• Administrative Ties: Figures connected to both the company and the administration bridged the gap; for example, former Clinton White House Chief of Staff Mack McLarty served on Acxiom’s board.
Interesting
“Clinton himself had visited Acxiom headquarters on October 5, 2001, and recommended the company be considered as a first line of defense against terrorists boarding airplanes. Retired General Wesley Clark, an Arkansan, seconded the recommendation with his own positive assessment and later helped the company open doors as a consultant. Acxiom’s help, however, precipitated a crisis pitting national security interests against the personal privacy of citizens. “A lot of the headway we have made lies in the access that General Clark has provided,” said Morgan in a 2002 memo, “Here’s the approach he takes to helping position Acxiom: ‘IT has a role to play because we’ll never be safe enough if we try to build walls and conduct searches and screenings. We have to really know who our neighbors are and what their interests are.’” In February 2003 Acxiom became a passenger prescreening subcontractor.
The perils of such an data sharing alliance became clear after JetBlue released five million passenger records to Pentagon subcontractor Torch Concepts to determine whether patterns in passenger travel datasets could reveal potential terrorists who might use planes to attack military bases. Torch matched some of the JetBlue records to Social Security numbers, wealth status, occupation, and other data it received from Acxiom. For the tests Torch used what it called a legitimate intermediary, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), now part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The way the data was passed along not only failed to meet federal compliance standards but, EPIC alleged, violated Acxiom’s own privacy policies and represented deceptive trade practices. The breach was discovered when Torch included private information on a JetBlue customer on a slide in a Homeland Security symposium presentation entitled, “Homeland Security: Airline Passenger Risk Assessment.”
Acxiom China entered the Chinese market in 2000, operating as a data-driven omni-channel marketing and technology services provider.
Key Details
• Headquarters: Shanghai, China
• Technology R&D Center: Nantong, China
• Official Website: Acxiom China
Core Solutions & Services in China
• Intelligent Operations Platform & Tech Solutions: Data integration and analytics infrastructure.
• E-Commerce Omni-Audience Operations: Audience management and targeted digital advertising.
• WeChat Ecosystem Consumer Operations: Brand retention, engagement, and CRM/ECRM solutions tailored to Chinese digital platforms.
• Omni-Channel Member Operations: Customer data platform (CDP) and loyalty management.
Acxiom China entered the Chinese market in 2000, operating as a data-driven omni-channel marketing and technology services provider.
Key Details
• Headquarters: Shanghai, China
• Technology R&D Center: Nantong, China
• Official Website: Acxiom China
Core Solutions & Services in China
• Intelligent Operations Platform & Tech Solutions: Data integration and analytics infrastructure.
• E-Commerce Omni-Audience Operations: Audience management and targeted digital advertising.
• WeChat Ecosystem Consumer Operations: Brand retention, engagement, and CRM/ECRM solutions tailored to Chinese digital platforms.
• Omni-Channel Member Operations: Customer data platform (CDP) and loyalty management.
A bit of history
Demographics, Inc. was founded in 1969 in Conway, Arkansas, by Charles D. Ward to process mailing lists and data for political and commercial campaigns.
Key Milestones
• Founding & Early Work: Originally created to handle data and mailing lists for the Democratic Party and local businesses.
• Leadership Change: Charles D. Morgan acquired control of the company in 1978 and led its expansion into payroll processing, direct marketing, and large-scale data management.
• Name Changes: Renamed CCX Network, Inc. in 1980, went public in 1983, and became Acxiom Corporation in 1988.
• Legacy: Acxiom grew into a global data-mining and marketing giant, later splitting in 2018 when its marketing solutions arm was acquired by Interpublic Group (IPG) and the remaining technology division became LiveRamp.
They were big donors to the Clinton Foundation.
Jerry C. Jones, Acxiom Corporation’s Chief Ethics and Legal Officer, has known Hillary Clinton since 1974. He joined Acxiom in 1999.
Acxiom Corporation were also involved in helping to find 11 out of 19 hijackers on September 14, 2001. The company director at the time was Mark McLarty, former Chief of Staff in the Clinton Administration. Clinton was also in contact with Jones.
In 2010, Acxiom committed to developing Reach In, Reach Out (RIRO) to develop and publicize practices “to be used to include people of the Muslim faith in community affairs and corporate interactions”.
When the insurance company I used to work for signed with them in the early 1990s, they said they had a 98% chance of correctly identifying a customer or a lead. If a person called in on a policy, we’d send that information to Axciom and get it backed enhanced so we could target market them. We also used them for data cleansing as at the time we had customer databases for our 6-7 product lines & so the same person could be represented in multiple different ways (e.g.: Joseph Smith vs. Joe Smith etc.) We created a centralized customer database that integrated with the different product platforms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.