Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/27/2026 12:16:51 PM PDT by lasereye
Many of you who read Just the Facts know my 2003 book, Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11. It reached #2 on the New York Times hardcover nonfiction list that fall. Its final chapter, “The Interrogation,” broke the story of what Al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah told CIA interrogators shortly after his capture. There’s front-page news today that brought me back to it —and what the coverage is missing.
A military judge, Air Force Lt. Col. Michael Schrama, has set a June 5, 2028 trial date for 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and three of his Guantánamo Bay co-defendants, Walid bin Attash, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. Schrama rejected prosecutors’ request to begin in January 2027, ruling that it left too little time to resolve the pending motions to suppress evidence derived from CIA interrogations. A trial date was set once before, for January 2021. It came and went. A fifth original co-defendant, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, was severed from the case in 2023 after a military medical panel found that his treatment in CIA custody had left him psychotic and unfit to stand trial.
Look at who isn’t on this list.
Abu Zubaydah.
Zubaydah was shot, wounded, and captured in Faisalabad, Pakistan, in March 2002, and then transferred among CIA black sites for more than four years before being sent to Guantánamo in September 2006.
In 2003, I broke major news from some of the earliest secret interrogations after his capture. The CIA, I reported, had run a false-flag operation on him. He was flown to a facility in Afghanistan dressed up to look like a Saudi detention site. Two Arab-American Special Forces personnel posed as Saudi interrogators. The idea was that he’d be terrified of what the Saudis might do to him. Instead — according to the intelligence sources who described the session to me — he seemed relieved. He named three Saudi princes and the chief of Pakistan’s air force, and recited their private cell phone numbers from memory. The numbers checked out.
Zubaydah said two of the four had known in advance that al-Qaeda was going to strike America — not the specific targets, just that something was coming.
When he later learned his interrogators were Americans, not Saudis, he recanted everything, insisting he had invented it all.
Washington passed what he’d said to Riyadh and Islamabad anyway. Both governments came back within days and said his charges were false.
Then this happened:
July 22, 2002 — Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz, 43, a nephew of King Fahd and the owner of War Emblem, which had won the Kentucky Derby three months earlier, dies in a Riyadh hospital, of a cause variously reported as a heart attack or a blood clot.
July 23, 2002 — Prince Sultan bin Faisal bin Turki al-Saud, 41, dies in a one-car crash, on his way to Ahmed’s funeral.
Days later — Prince Fahd bin Turki bin Saud al-Kabir, 25, dies on a 55-mile drive east of Riyadh. The Royal Court’s official cause of death: “thirst.”
February 20, 2003 — Air Chief Marshal Mushaf Ali Mir dies when his recently inspected aircraft came apart in clear weather over Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier, killing his wife and most of his senior staff. Sabotage was suspected. No one has ever been arrested.
I’ve spent a career dismantling mystery-death lists. In Case Closed, my book on the JFK assassination, I wrote a separate appendix debunking the claim that 103 people connected to the case had died under suspicious circumstances. I know exactly how that genre works. Still, I have never been comfortable with the four deaths that overlap with Zubaydah’s interrogation disclosures.
After Why America Slept was published, the CIA told some reporters on background that my account was wrong. I insisted the CIA should release Zubaydah’s interrogation tapes.
In November 2005, the CIA secretly destroyed 92 videotapes of Zubaydah’s interrogations. That only became public in late 2007. It took until April 2010, when internal CIA emails were released under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, to learn that the destruction order came from Jose Rodriguez, then the head of the agency’s clandestine service, and that then-CIA Director Porter Goss agreed with the decision — though he wasn’t told in advance, and White House Counsel Harriet Miers was reportedly livid when she learned of it two days later. No one was ever prosecuted.
None of this gets litigated in 2028. Zubaydah has no trial date because Zubaydah has never been charged with a crime. The government’s term for him is a forever prisoner. The reason may be plainer than anyone wants to say: charge him, and in a courtroom he might be confronted with what he said in a fake “Saudi” jail cell in 2002.
It is only a couple of weeks until the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks, and the full truth about what senior Saudis or Pakistanis may have known in advance is still elusive.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Thanks for the update,
They left when flights resumed iirc.
Owens has figured out that there’s an automatic (low IQ) audience for any and all allegations against Israel.
But what's always fascinated me about Al Qaeda is that we always knew that they were funded and built up largely from both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Yet we responded with war against Afghanistan, not Pakistan.
Because Pakistan had nukes. It taught Pakistan and everyone else paying attention that you can attack the U.S. by proxy and not get hit back if you have nukes.
Fast forward to Iran today. Until Israel and the U.S. started striking back at Iran directly in 2025, Iran had been attacking indirectly through proxies like Hamas (Gaza) and Hezbollah (Lebanon) and Houthi (Yemen). That includes Iran attacking American ships in the Red Sea repeatedly in 2023 and 2024 through the Houthi proxies.
With that in mind, I'm a strong supporter in hitting Iran hard and making an example out of them, and keeping Iran from getting nukes. We can't let them become the next Pakistan.
Because they don’t really want to end terrorism. What would they run on?
Thanks for the clarification.
My surmise is that the Saudis and Pakis (mostly) got a pass because the 9/11 attack was due to a joint US-Saudi intelligence operation that escaped control due to manipulation by covert Al Queda loyalists in Saudi Arabian and Pakistani intelligence. This would explain some of the mysteries and oddities about the 9/11 attack. The plan was to humiliate Al Queda by exposing the plot and rounding up the intended 9/11 attackers.
Well that didn't work out very well, did it?
No. The CIA can be astonishingly arrogant and stupid at times. There is also some suspicion that later CIA director John Brennan had a role as a witting or unwitting in-too-deep ally of Saudi Arabia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.