Posted on 06/05/2026 9:44:06 PM PDT by Red Badger
In a new ruling released on Friday, a federal judge held that the Trump administration agency that oversees lawful U.S. immigration must stop enforcing several policies that paused adjudication of certain immigration-benefit applications.
1*On June 5, 2026, a federal judge in Rhode Island struck down four USCIS policies that paused or delayed certain immigration benefit decisions for applicants from 39 travel ban countries.
✅ The court declared four USCIS policies unlawful and vacated them: pic.twitter.com/KrUIxLYRVn— AK Poku Law, PLLC (@greencard1awyer) June 5, 2026
The decision came Friday morning in a voluminous order written by Rhode Island's U.S. District Court Chief Judge, John J. McConnell Jr.:
In a searing 135-page opinion, Judge John J. McConnell Jr. wrote that actions to lock eligible asylum seekers out of the immigration system and deny others temporary work permits had made it functionally impossible for a broad swath of people to remain in the country. He said the measures were improperly fueled by “anti-immigration sentiments” and contrary to immigration laws.
The policies, enacted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, included a global hold on asylum applications filed with the agency. U.S.C.I.S. also paused decisions on immigration applications filed by people from the 39 countries, largely in Africa and the Middle East, that are subject to the president’s travel ban, halting their ability to obtain green cards and other benefits.
The sweeping measures also touched lawful permanent residents who have lived in the country legally for years but have been effectively unable to be approved for citizenship because decisions on naturalization applications had ground to a halt.
McConnell wrote that:
“The rule of law has to apply to everyone equally and, as evident here, U.S.C.I.S. has neither ‘followed the law’ nor ‘done things the right way.’”
The opinion continued:
“Over six months later, many of those individuals remain without work, without legal status and without any meaningful ability to plan for their futures,” Judge McConnell wrote.
Judge McConnell...wrote that the various holds violated the immigration laws governing the responsibilities of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and that the agency had routinely applied the law unequally under the policies. He noted in particular strident claims President Trump made last year after the shooting in Washington, blaming immigrants for a range of social problems, including housing shortages and “urban decay.”
The judge wrote that the burden of the changes fell hardest on people who had followed all the procedures demanded of them, rather than immigrants who entered the country illegally, whom the Trump administration routinely vilifies.
“The court is reminded of a line often repeated in discussions around immigration policy: If people wish to immigrate to the United States, they ought to ‘follow the law’ and ‘do things the right way,’” he wrote. “This case serves as a perfect example of immigrants doing just that.”
Judge McConnell was nominated for the federal bench seat in 2011 by former President Barack Obama.
The suit was filed by a group of nonprofit organizations, led by two Providence-based nonprofits, Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island and Refugee Dream Center, according to local publication, The Rhode Island Current. The lawsuit was also joined by union groups that support immigrants' claims.
The lawsuit against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services stemmed from the order by President Donald Trump to pause or delay adjudications, particularly for applicants from designated countries, and impose re-review procedures for some refugees, after two National Guardsmen were shot, one fatally, in Washington, D.C., by an Afghan terror suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who was living in the United States on an expired 2021 temporary visa.
In reaction to the ruling, in an emailed statement to The Current in the story linked above, James Percival, legal counsel for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the umbrella agency for USCIS, said:
“The Left has been running the same gambit with so called ‘animus’ claims since 2017. It is sabotage dressed in legal clothing. It goes like this: (1) the admin is racist, (2) therefore a policy I don’t like is motivated by race, (3) therefore it is invalid. They have used it on virtually every Trump era Department of Homeland Security policy.”
As we wrote last Friday afternoon, two other decisions, which have had major ramifications for two of President Trump's priorities - the DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund and the renovation/renaming of the Trump Kennedy Center - were released by district judges.
This may also be worth noting as a side point, readers: Judge John J. McConnell Jr. reportedly has deep pockets when it comes to Democrats running for elected office. A report cited by The Daily Signal on Friday claimed that in 2025, data shed light on his generous donations:
In total, he contributed $190,000 to members of Congress and at least $200,000 combined to the Democrat Party at the national and state level, CQ Roll Call reported.
Judge McConnell also allegedly sided with blue-state Dems in several cases about Trump administration spending cuts that sought to cut waste, fraud, and abuse. The judge's wife also contributed $250,000 to Democrats, according to the Daily Signal story linked above.
You can read the full opinion from Friday here.
While it has not officially been announced yet, the Trump administration will likely appeal. Stay tuned.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
All Federal Judges should be barred from contributing to any political party, PAC, politician or NGO. Only to religious affiliated organizations..........
Unlikely this decision will last.
Why do we even have a POTUS? Just let the almighty judges rule on everything.............
Another decision that will be overturned on appeal.
Given the alarming rate at which these decisions are being overturned, I don’t get spun up anymore. Actually, I am enjoying seeing 135 page opinions amounting to nothing more than a written tantrum.
“...had made it functionally impossible for a broad swath of people to remain in the country.”
I think that was rather the point. A good one too.
This judge is full of something........this issue was adjudicated years ago by higher courts, and found to be within admin discretion.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4350351/posts
Well well well… Judge McConnell donated $700K to Democrats.
X ^ | 11/02/2025 | C3
Posted on 11/2/2025, 11:26:29 PM by SmokingJoe
Well well well…
Judge McConnell donated $700K to Democrats.
He runs nonprofit Crossroads Rhode Island that has received $128 million in government funding.
McConnell is now demanding POTUS Trump illegally fund SNAP.
After he tried to block DOGE cuts.
He’s a Dem activist.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Yeah, no s**t.
That's what we voted for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.