Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

INDEPENDENCE DAY ☙ Friday, May 1, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS
Coffee and Covid ^ | May 1st 2026 | Jeff Childers

Posted on 05/01/2026 1:10:39 PM PDT by Jacquerie

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court didn’t just tweak Louisiana’s map; it quietly detonated the Voting Rights Act’s entire race‑engineering regime, and now that shrapnel is ripping through Congress, blue‑state fortresses, and the forgotten local boards, commissions, and councils that for forty years have co-opted our democratic institutions via identity politics pods.

In plain English, the ruling is already triggering at least four massive downstream shocks— three of which nobody has bothered pointing out to us, even though they are probably the biggest stories of all:

1. A red‑state rush to redraw maps before the midterms, now unshackled from court‑mandated “majority‑minority” districts and old Section 2 racial targets.

2. A blue‑state brick wall, which ambitious Democratic gerrymanders and constitutional amendments are suddenly slamming into because their legal doorway just evaporated into thin air.

3. A federal lawfare Uno-reverse, with Trump’s DOJ already promising to apply its civil‑rights powers to attack the race‑driven maps it used to defend, and to enforce Callais in “every state that has such a district.”

4. An earthquake rumbling under local government, where decades‑old Section 2–era “remedies” — single‑member districts, special minority seats, and other race‑tuned structures in cities, counties, and school boards — are now open to attack as potentially unconstitutional racial engineering. (Racers, take your marks.)

The implications are nothing less than astonishing. In practical terms, the DOJ can (and likely will) systematically review existing maps across blue states to identify districts where race was an explicit or predominant factor in line‑drawing, especially where the old Voting Rights Act framework was used as an excuse to draw pretzel-like majority‑minority districts. (Illinois’s 4th Congressional District, for instance, looks like two oddly shaped neighborhoods connected by a highway median, which is technically two pretzels, with extra salt, but whatever.)

(Excerpt) Read more at coffeeandcovid.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:
Heavily excerpted. Read the entirety.
1 posted on 05/01/2026 1:10:39 PM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

What a great, informative, and upbeat article. Thank you for posting it.

It is great to have a victory.

I am not sure what has happened to Free Republic lately, but I’ve almost gotten the feeling that it isn’t a place for me anymore to be among like-minded people.

The negativity of this website lately, both from people who are deliberately trying to alter the general mood downwards for their own purposes, and people who are so intellectually and spiritually weak that even though they feel defeated, they feel the need to post negative things all the time in order to bring everybody down to their level. It’s almost a weird form of emotional Marxism, in which everybody is not brought up to an elevated emotional level, but are purposely depressed down to the same negative level they are at.

As for the known group of people who practice a propagandistic form of active warfare on this website, I feel nothing but contempt for them.


2 posted on 05/01/2026 2:30:34 PM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Great article, great news.


3 posted on 05/01/2026 3:07:16 PM PDT by Reddy (BO stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

For many years courts ruled that all redstricting had to give more voting power to minorities, especially blacks.

Any attempt to balance the districts so that state elections would be more representative of the political average would be met with liberal courts that would strike it down.

The legal theory was that blacks would be disenfranchised if their votes were diluted (even if the dilution still gave their votes more weight than that of whites).

Nevermind that conservative black voters are disenfranchised by the liberal gerrymandering.

Basically the Supreme Court reversed the practice of treating race as a voting block. Voters are individual citizens.

When Republicans gerrymandered maps, it was never to disenfranchise any voter, let alone a specific race of voters. It was simply to leverage the balance of power in their favor. Unfortunately, only the liberals were permitted to do this. Fortunately, that has been rectified.

President Trump has, so far, been wrong about one thing: I’m still not tired of winning.


4 posted on 05/01/2026 5:53:43 PM PDT by unlearner (See my about page for "God's Promises During Tribulation".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel; unlearner
The Biden administration did nothing when demonstrators protested and threatened USSC justices in front of their homes. Chuck Schumer said in March 2020 that Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch would "pay the price" if they ruled against abortion rights. And Democrats have said they are going to "stack the court."

To me, it might be possible that the conservatives on the court have had enough of threats and intimidation from the Democrats. The decision to do away with gerrymandering strikes at the very heart of Democrat power, and their party might not recover for decades - God willing!

You didn't see THAT coming did you Chuck Schumer!

5 posted on 05/01/2026 8:09:11 PM PDT by Enterprise (Dear President Trump: With Iran, if you're going to shoot - shoot. Don't talk. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

That is a nice way of viewing it-I like the way you think.

This is huge, and I don’t think everyone on our side sees it that way yet. It is far-reaching.


6 posted on 05/01/2026 9:57:03 PM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Thanks. It was an epic FAFO and Schumer et al ended up on the FO side of it.


7 posted on 05/01/2026 10:52:21 PM PDT by Enterprise (Dear President Trump: With Iran, if you're going to shoot - shoot. Don't talk. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

I can’t wrap my mind around the entirety of horrid laws passed these past 60 years due to unconstitutional reading of the 14A and Voting/Civil Rights Acts.

Laws that were passed by slim democrat majorities all these years. Decades of blacks inciting racial hatred and judges drawing congressional districts that ensured democrat congressmen and civil strife.

Piss on the Warren Court for what it did to our republic.


8 posted on 05/02/2026 3:34:16 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson