Posted on 04/15/2026 5:49:56 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
A generally good summary into some of the financial issues happening in the background of the dire Straits of Hormuz.
Susan Kokinda highlights UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declining to join an American blockade and claims Britain has lost control of the choke point. She details financial actions targeting Iranian money flows, including UAE arrests of IRGC-linked money changers, Treasury Secretary Bessent using Patriot Act Section 311 against a Zurich bank, and scrutiny of London-based crypto exchanges and Santander UK. She cites a UK military chief admitting Britain’s war planning has lapsed since the Cold War and links fuel disruptions and protests to the conflict, concluding Trump has forced a hidden imperial system into the open.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Bkmk
BUMP!
I’ve been loving Promethean Action’s analysis. Thanks for posting.
Best ongoing analysis available, anywhere. Does this mean that Lyndon LaRouche wasn’t the loose-cannon-wingnut he was portrayed to be?
For later.
L
I’m not sure how to answer that.......(but have been wondering....)
Lloyds of London was the insurer for much of the oil being moved around the world. When Starmer refused to send military assistance, it basically destroyed Lloyds’ reputation, as now the British military doesn’t have the resources to back up the insurance on the oil being transported.
Trump put the American military in charge of Hormuz and thereby stole Lloyds’ reputation.
Whether that be the case or not, he was an absolute nut job. I happened to be in Federal Court one day and saw LaRouche testifying for debtor's interrogatories in front of a magistrate. That is, someone had sued him, obtained a judgment, and brought him into court to testify under oath about what assets he might have and where they were. LaRouche's story was that he had no idea where his food came from or who paid the money for his rent and upkeep. The meals just appeared three times a day, his clothes were laundered and replaced as needed, a car and driver were available as needed, cash just appeared as if magically in his wallet, and he had not a single clue as to who was paying for this or why. How could you respect someone like that?
His analysis of issues was never the problem, it was how he wanted to solve them.
What isn't funny is how many so-called conspiracy theories that have turned out to be true.
There are a lot of movements that analyze situations pretty well but have terrible solutions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.