Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rhode Island Democrats Move to Ban Possession of Commonly Owned Firearms
AmmoLand ^ | April 7, 2026 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 04/10/2026 4:29:11 AM PDT by marktwain

On June 26, 2025, Governor of Rhode Island (D) Dan McKee signed into law a ban on the manufacture, purchase, sale or transfer of certain firearms. The firearms affected were semi-automatic shotguns with fixed magazine capacity exceeding six rounds, shotguns with revolving cylinders, and semi-automatic rifles with fixed magazine capacity exceeding ten rounds.

In addition, the ban covers semi-automatic rifles which can accept a detachable magazine and which have any one or more of the following characteristics:

The ban also covers semi-automatic pistols with a fixed magazine capacity exceeding 10 rounds and any semi-automatic firearm that can accept a belt ammunition feeding device.

The ban does not include .22 rimfire rifles with attached tubular magazines.  The ban does not appear to include pistols with detachable magazines or semi-automatic shotguns with detachable magazines. On February 27, 2026, Democrats in the Senate introduced a bill to add possession to the prohibitions already passed in 2025. This changes the ban on obtaining the affected firearms into a ban on possessing them.

Senate sponsors to add “Possession” are:   Alana M. DiMario, district 36;Dawn Euer, district 13; Meghan E. Kallman, district 15;  Pamela J. Lauria, district 32; Tiara T. Mack, district 6; Mark P. McKenney, district 30; Linda L. Ujifusa, district 11; Bridget Valverde, district 35; and Samuel D. Zurier, district 3.

The Rhode Island Senate contains 38 senators. 17 are women, 21 are men. Four are Republicans, 34 are Democrats. All of the sponsors of the bill to ban possession are

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2a; ban; banglist; bill
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Rhode Island Democrats look to ban common firearms.
1 posted on 04/10/2026 4:29:11 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It’s like the Second Amendment just doesn’t exist at all.

Hey, let’s make Islam illegal and close all the mosques. Or is the First Amendment still there? How come we still have the First Amendment, but not the Second Amendment?


2 posted on 04/10/2026 4:36:04 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The entire northeast down to Maryland is a liberal shxthole so anything they do is the opposite of what’s right.


3 posted on 04/10/2026 4:42:37 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

New Hampshire is pretty good. Maine is better than the others.


4 posted on 04/10/2026 4:44:21 AM PDT by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This is the same as Canada.

So if the 2nd Amendment allows the same as Canada, what is it ...?


5 posted on 04/10/2026 4:51:55 AM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Anschluss now !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Did I read wrong, or is the title misleading. The title says “Ban Possession of Commonly Owned Firearms” and the article itself says “ban on the manufacture, purchase, sale or transfer of certain firearms.”

That’s a big difference, for if one currently owns one of the about to be prohibited weapons they will not be violating any law.

But I do fully understand the basic point to be made is that the law is infringement on the right to own weapons and to defend ones self. Typical demorcat communists trying to disarm the public.


6 posted on 04/10/2026 4:56:05 AM PDT by redfreedom (The Forth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The clock is ticking here in Maine as the Democrats pull one stunt after another. They have no opposition to any of the things that they are throwing out. Governor Mills is as corrupt as they come and her Mini-Me, Shenna Bellows, is thought of as a shoe-in for governor in the next election. I don’t buy it, but what do I know?


7 posted on 04/10/2026 4:56:39 AM PDT by pingman (Hi Ho Silver! AWAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

And if Spermburger has her way, Virginia will be joining them.


8 posted on 04/10/2026 4:57:11 AM PDT by redfreedom (The Forth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The commiecrats never stop trying. They so deeply want to be the next Stalin, and they will stop at nothing to achieve that goal.

What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED do they not understand?

When they knock on YOUR door, you know what to do.


9 posted on 04/10/2026 5:15:11 AM PDT by meyer (CONGRATULATIONS WORLD, IT’S TIME FOR PEACE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

New Hampshire and Maine are liberal as hell. Fag flags and rainbows everywhere. Taxed to death, no infrastructure, horrible roads. I was born and raised in Maine and left 46 years ago. Was just up there for 10 days and it’s a disaster at best. The governor, Janet Mills and the legislators are all insanely libtards.


10 posted on 04/10/2026 5:15:47 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Ya, makes sense. Take away features that make the weapon unsafe while firing. Only a demoncrat could figure that one.


11 posted on 04/10/2026 5:16:25 AM PDT by Mlheureux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

brian griffin is celebrating.


12 posted on 04/10/2026 5:17:03 AM PDT by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I have mixed feelings.
Come the Civil War they may regret these policies.


13 posted on 04/10/2026 5:27:35 AM PDT by Kozak (Слава Україні Герояам Слава. RuZZia is a terrorist stat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

What about the shoulder thing that goes up?


14 posted on 04/10/2026 5:28:12 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“grenade launcher”

From my cold dead fingers


15 posted on 04/10/2026 5:33:16 AM PDT by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This is why the Founding Fathers didn’t give women the right to vote.


16 posted on 04/10/2026 5:33:18 AM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“ Hey, let’s make Islam illegal and close all the mosques. Or is the First Amendment still there? How come we still have the First Amendment, but not the Second Amendment?”

I think we should be able to do this without violating the 1st. Declare that Islam does not meet the requirements of “religion” to qualify, and may not be practiced here.


17 posted on 04/10/2026 5:34:20 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

And it doesn’t let ok like the Feds will care one bit:

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/fpc-statement-on-trump-administrations-decision-to-support-biden-gun-control-rule


18 posted on 04/10/2026 5:40:30 AM PDT by Manuel OKelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
All of the sponsors of the bill to ban possession are

anti-2A Communists....

What did I win?? 😀

19 posted on 04/10/2026 5:43:52 AM PDT by DeplorableTrumpSupporter (FKA ConservaTeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom
The title says “Ban Possession of Commonly Owned Firearms” and the article itself says “ban on the manufacture, purchase, sale or transfer of certain firearms.” That’s a big difference, for if

From the article:
On February 27, 2026, Democrats in the Senate introduced a bill to add possession to the prohibitions already passed in 2025.

So the ban on manufacture, purchase, etc., was passed in June 2025. Adding possession to it is what is on the table now.

20 posted on 04/10/2026 5:43:53 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson