Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This week is the 44th anniversary of the Falklands War between Great Britain and Argentina.
X ^ | 04/09/2026 | Jonathan Turley

Posted on 04/09/2026 3:04:05 PM PDT by SmokingJoe

This week is the 44th anniversary of the Falklands War between Great Britain and Argentina. This week, the British Navy is struggling to put a single destroyer to sea to protect its assets. thetimes.com/uk/defence/art… Argentina is now saying it wants the Falklands back...

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: argentina; falklands

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Does Starmer have the stomach to fight a war over the Falklands? Nope.
1 posted on 04/09/2026 3:04:05 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

What do the residents/citizens/subjects/inhabitants of the Falklands want?


2 posted on 04/09/2026 3:06:46 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

That long?

Seems like just yesterday I was standing on the deck of a British frigate that held an open house on a sunny day in the Port of LA, a ship which had recently taken part in that war, congratulating the crew hosting.


3 posted on 04/09/2026 3:08:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
What do the residents/citizens/subjects/inhabitants of the Falklands want?

That question is irrelevant.

4 posted on 04/09/2026 3:10:18 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

> Does Starmer have the stomach to fight a war over the Falklands? <

Starmer has neither the stomach nor the ships. But he does have plenty of admirals. There are now more Royal Navy admirals than there are Royal Navy combat ships.

Anyway, would the US Navy help Britain if asked?

Anyway (part 2): There’s a different government in Argentina now. Would they be willing to roll the dice again?


5 posted on 04/09/2026 3:12:57 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Wasn’t our war - wait, but we helped …


6 posted on 04/09/2026 3:13:25 PM PDT by 11th_VA ("I got him before he got me.“ - President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
...After years of neglect, Britain appears to have abandoned its naval power. Recently, the urgent call for a British aircraft carrier to sail was reportedly scrapped due to a 9-5 contract. jpost.com/international/… While soldiers are being disciplined for raising the lack of readiness, thetimes.com/uk/defence/art…, but they may need a bit more than Boaty McBoatface in the near future.

https://x.com/i/status/2042318289943048569

7 posted on 04/09/2026 3:14:24 PM PDT by SmokingJoe (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Did Argentina ever have the falklands in the first place ?


8 posted on 04/09/2026 3:15:12 PM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

Good question.


9 posted on 04/09/2026 3:18:28 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Even if the British carrier Prince of Wales did sail, the Royal Navy does not have near enough escort ships needed to accompany it.

According to some reports, only one RN escort ship is ready to sail. The others are all being repaired, refitted, or whatever.


10 posted on 04/09/2026 3:20:45 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Every morning meeting for coffee with a just retired Senior Rear Admiral and an ex WWII British Commando, the LA Times and the San Diego Union to lay them out on the table and discuss the war.


11 posted on 04/09/2026 3:21:21 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
"Wasn’t our war - wait, but we helped …"

Not right away. There was some delay due to concerns and/or interpretations of the Monroe Doctrine.
12 posted on 04/09/2026 3:27:10 PM PDT by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Starmer’s been to busy spending tax payer money on putting illegals in hotels to spend money fixing British Navy ships.


13 posted on 04/09/2026 3:28:12 PM PDT by SmokingJoe (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

According to this article, Argentina claims the Falkland Islands because the islands were once occupied by Spain. And Argentina is the successor to Spain.

Britain obviously disagrees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute


14 posted on 04/09/2026 3:30:29 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

First European to step foot on the islands was an English man- John Strong.


15 posted on 04/09/2026 3:32:08 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

“Does Starmer have the stomach to fight a war over the Falklands?”

really doesn’t matter whether he has the stomach to fight or not: UK no longer has a blue-water navy ...


16 posted on 04/09/2026 3:32:47 PM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I calibrated some of the meters on the two Argentine submarines that Great Britain sank. I’m so proud.


17 posted on 04/09/2026 3:33:13 PM PDT by Poser (Cogito ergo Spam - I think, therefore I ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

The UK does not have the resources to safely put either the HMS Prince of Wales or the HMS Queen Elizabeth out to sea.

And the UK has a huge migrant problem. Perhaps the UK should turn both ships into floating migrant hotels.

When life hands you lemons, make lemonade.

———

(I’m kidding of course. I hope Starmer doesn’t see my post. Because he just might try it.)


18 posted on 04/09/2026 3:39:00 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

That seems like a real stretch.


19 posted on 04/09/2026 3:47:58 PM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

That was Thatcher’s Britain.

1982.

Long ago and far, far away.

That Great Britain no longer exists.


20 posted on 04/09/2026 4:11:21 PM PDT by jmacusa ( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson