Posted on 03/30/2026 1:30:18 PM PDT by Words Matter
By the 'grace' of Islamic lobby OIC: genocidal Hamas-"Palestine" [Jallad] to win UN so called "human rights" top job.
The 'OIC lobby' and its allies are once again hijacking the United Nations to push a viciously anti-Israel, pro-terror agenda—this time by installing a vocal defender of Hamas terrorism as a supposed “human rights expert.”
On March 31, 2026, the UN Human Rights Council is poised to appoint Palestinian academic Zeina Jallad as Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures. This is a mandate originally cooked up in 2014 via an 'Iran-sponsored resolution', designed not to protect rights but to shield rogue regimes from accountability while smearing Western and Israeli security measures.
Jallad has openly defended Hamas—a designated terrorist organization whose charter calls for Israel’s destruction and whose fighters carried out the barbaric October 7, 2023 massacre, raping, burning, and murdering over 1,200 Israelis and taking hundreds hostage. In her own words, she describes Hamas as a legitimate “political party” that “won the elections in 2007,” dismisses the October 7 atrocities as merely “a revolt,” and claims the real issue is that the world created a “devil” out of Hamas to blame it for everything. She laments the “boycott” of Hamas by Europe and the “blockade” by Israel, while conveniently ignoring why those measures were imposed: Hamas’s relentless rocket fire, suicide bombings, and explicit goal of jihad against the Jewish state.
She has justified violence against Israeli civilians as “resistance” and pushed to expel Israel from international bodies altogether. This is not human rights advocacy; this is 'terror apologetics' dressed up in academic language.
The Real Agenda.
Israel’s Foreign Ministry rightly called out the selection as “outrageous,” noting that it exposes the entire process as nakedly political rather than rooted in genuine concern for human rights. A mandate born from Iranian influence is now being handed to someone who whitewashes the very terrorists responsible for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.
This fits a long, shameful pattern. The 'Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)'—a bloc of 57 Muslim-majority states—functions as a powerful lobby inside the UN system, consistently weaponizing human rights mechanisms to demonize Israel while shielding actual human rights abusers, from Hamas and Hezbollah to Iran, Syria, and beyond. Under their influence, the UNHRC has passed far more resolutions condemning the Jewish state than against all other countries combined, including the world’s worst dictatorships. The appointment of Jallad is the latest example of this inverted morality: 'Hamas terrorists' are recast as “resistance fighters” or misunderstood politicians, while Israel—the only democracy in the Middle East defending its citizens against genocidal jihad—is portrayed as the villain.
Jallad even flips the timeline, suggesting we should talk about “October 6th” before October 7th, as if years of Hamas rule, tunnels, rockets, and incitement somehow justify slaughtering civilians at a music festival, in their homes, and on the roads.
Hypocrisy at the UN.
The hypocrisy is staggering. While the UN obsesses over “unilateral coercive measures” (i.e., sanctions on terror-sponsoring regimes), it shows zero interest in the real suffering caused by Hamas: diverting billions in international aid to build terror infrastructure instead of improving life for Gazans, using civilians as human shields, and rejecting every peace offer in favor of endless war aimed at Israel’s elimination.
UN Watch has sounded the alarm and urged countries like the UK to vote NO on this appointment. Democratic nations that value actual human rights—not propaganda—must reject this farce. Appointing a Hamas defender to a UN human rights post doesn’t advance peace or justice; it normalizes terrorism, rewards October 7 denialism, and further erodes the UN’s already tattered credibility.
Israel has every right to defend itself against Hamas’s genocidal campaign. The Jewish state does not need lectures on human rights from those who excuse or celebrate the deliberate massacre of its people. The OIC-Hamas axis at the UN should be exposed and opposed, not empowered. True human rights begin with condemning terrorism unequivocally—not rebranding it as “revolt.”
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
United Nothing.
Another Goebbels “Fascista Francesca Albanese” bozo?
I guess the pro Hamas gang on Wikipedia have a new source.
BTW, UNHRC also promoted the “genocide” propaganda. So its new chief will only accelerate ut.
For anyone else searching for the “RS” reference in the title to be defined in the article, don’t bother. It is not there.
I had to ask Google AI:
In Wikipedia’s internal terminology and editor guidelines, “RS” stands for Reliable Sources. This is a core content policy requiring that articles are based on published, credible sources, rather than original research, to ensure accuracy and verifiability.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+2
Key details regarding “RS” (Reliable Sources) on Wikipedia:
Purpose: It ensures all content is supported by reliable, third-party published sources.
Application: It is strictly applied to all mainspace articles, particularly biographies of living persons.
Usage: Editors often refer to this policy as “WP:RS” in talk page discussions, noticeboards, and edit summaries.
Noticeboard: The “Reliable sources/Noticeboard” is where editors discuss whether specific sources meet the reliability standard.
The Godless Reprobate United Nations
eagerly awaits Satan’s Antichrist
UNHRC?
United
Nations
Hillary
Rodham
Clinton?
The UN Secretariat building is 525ft tall. Who knew 🐂💩 can pile so high?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.