Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 01/13/2026 10:40:13 AM PST by bitt
The dumbest Supreme Court Justice once again humiliated the legendary institution with not only her ignorance of the case at hand but with a question that resembled Kamal Harris’s worst word salads. The embarrassment was so severe that Justice Neil Gorsuch had to step in at one point.
As CBS reported, the Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday on whether laws from Idaho and West Virginia that ban biological males from playing in girls’ and women’s sports violate the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection and the landmark law known as Title IX.
Two bio males, Lindsay Hecox of Idaho and Becky Pepper-Jackson of West Virginia, sued their respective states, claiming they discriminate based on sex and transgender status. They claim the states’ laws ban every ‘transgender’ female from school sports, and treat them worse than others.
This is, of course, not true. West Virginia and Idaho are simply relying on science to ensure actual fair play and the rights of female athletes.
During oral arguments, Ketanji Brown Jackson ignored the biology and promptly took the side of the fake females.
At one point, she appeared to be trying to ask Idaho Attorney General Alan Michael Hurst whether transgender females who have undergone medical transition should be treated the same as actual men under equal-protection law.
But as one will notice, her question came out quite messy, which confused Hurst for a moment. Then she interrupted him to clarify further.
Hurst responded by schooling Jackson before Justice Gorsuch intervened at the end.
LISTEN:
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
p
She’s nothing but a racist, retard DEI hire.
Affirmative action Jackson
Never doubt there are people who would vote to put Kamala on the SC in a heartbeat.
Well, since kadisha Jackson brown can’t define the gender issue, ‘they’ should recuse......🙄
JACKSON: So, to the extent that you have an individual who says what is happening in this law is that it is treating someone who transgender, but does not have, because of the medical interventions and the things that have been done, who does not have, uh, the same, uh, threat to physical competition and safety and all the reasons the state puts forward – that’s actually a different class, says this individual. And uh, so you’re not treating the class the same. And how do you respond to that? In other words, the as-applied challenge essentially redefines the class…So what is wrong with that number one and how do you square that with our uh, holdings, in Caban…In other words, Layer suggests that as-applied challenges of this nature do exist.
Well, to be fair, she’s not a biologist, so…
Justice Brown Jackson has ably demonstrated how the twisted logic of leftist ideology ties one’s brain in knots.
Dudes who wear dresses so they can compete in womens sports for the sole purpose of beating their asses easily cause they know they can is NOT a reason to allow them to play in womens sports
She makes Kamala sound educated!
all that BS is word salad to me.
> She’s nothing but a racist, retard DEI hire. <
You betcha. And now for the non-surprise of the day. Here are the three Republican senators who voted with every Democrat to confirm her: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Mitt Romney.
Bless Hurst for not blurting out what I would have said.... Maybe someone should.
Kamalala, is that you?
I hope Biden rots in Hell for foisting that dumbass on this nation. There for life.
That made my brain hurt.
When did the term “class” become a “thing” in legal philosophy?
They are not talking about social class, but rather a distinct social or identity grouping, to which a law applies.
Sounds very marxist to me.
Just because someone thinks they can change their gender (he or she) does NOT mean they can change their biological sex at birth (XY or XX chromosome).
You can have all the cosmetic surgery in the world but it does not change your DNA.
Thanks for noting that. Very important to recall -- daily -- that the RINOs in this nation are like the Cheneys, as rejected-by-her-constituents Liz campaigned for Harris-Walz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.