Posted on 11/29/2025 8:05:43 PM PST by Red Badger
The debate over expiring Obamacare subsidies has dominated national political discourse, but some experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation that Republicans could capitalize on growing momentum around price transparency to help lower healthcare costs for Americans.
The record-setting government shutdown was driven by Democrats’ refusal to budge on the expiring Obamacare premium subsidies, which they passed in 2021 without GOP support and set to expire at the end of 2025. Republicans are still debating their healthcare proposal, including whether to back a limited extension of those subsidies.
Even without a resolution on the subsidies in sight, some experts note that more can be done to build on the healthcare-related measures already taken. That includes President Donald Trump’s February executive order directing agencies to fulfill “radical price transparency” and require the disclosure of the actual prices of healthcare services.
Proponents of the executive order say that further measures could drive down costs by increasing competition and giving Americans more control over their healthcare spending.
“When Americans can see what they’re actually paying for in health care, competition works. Costs fall, middlemen lose their grip, and Americans get control over this critical part of their lives,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said in a statement to the DCNF.
“With President Trump’s transparency platform already in motion, now is the perfect time for his administration and Congress to deliver real affordability through ‘radical transparency,'” he said.
Trump’s executive order builds on an earlier order he signed in 2019, which required hospitals and health plans to provide price estimates for certain services. Shortly before leaving office in 2021, the president also signed the No Surprises Act, which bans surprise medical bills, requires providers to offer good-faith estimates of expected charges, and directs insurers to send patients an advanced explanation of benefits (AEOB).
If fully implemented, price transparency regulations could yield as much as $80 billion in annual healthcare savings, according to some estimates.
“Price transparency will reveal prices that vary 10x within a hospital depending on a patient’s plan, drive competition, protect from overcharges and lower costs,” Cynthia Fisher, founder and chair of PatientRightsAdvocate.org, told the DCNF. “Real prices will transform healthcare for the benefit of all patients, employers, workers, unions, and taxpayers.”
However, enforcement of the No Surprises Act stalled during the Biden administration, and the AEOB requirements have yet to be implemented nearly five years after the law’s passage.
Fisher on Tuesday wrote to the president, urging him to direct the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to issue and enforce the AEOB rule, begin delivering pricing information in 2026, and ensure employers have access to data needed to negotiate lower costs for employees, among other recommendations.
“By doing this, you will deliver a system in which patients, employees and unions — not the insurance and healthcare industry fat cats — hold the power,” Fisher wrote.
Lawmakers have also proposed codifying price transparency rules. The bipartisan Patients Deserve Price Tags Act, introduced by Republican Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas and Democrat Sen. John Hickenlooper of Colorado, would codify Trump’s 2025 executive order and require machine-readable files of all negotiated rates and cash prices between plans and providers, and mandate that hospitals post actual prices for all services starting in 2026.
Healthcare will be a critical issue in the upcoming midterms, according to a September Echelon Insights poll.
By a nine-point margin, voters said they trust Democrats more than Republicans on healthcare. However, the poll found that if in 2026 Trump requires providers to give patients actual prices before care, 62% of respondents said they would support the president’s healthcare agenda.
Moreover, half of the respondents said they would be more likely to back a midterm candidate who “helped Donald Trump deliver actual prices before care to patients.”
At the same time, Republicans in Congress are developing proposals to redirect Obamacare subsidies away from insurers and toward consumers purchasing their own coverage. The GOP argues such a shift would give individuals more control over their plans. The concept appears to have the backing of the president, who earlier in November called on Republicans in Congress to send dollars directly to Americans.
“The insurance companies are making a fortune. Their stock is up over 1,000% over a short period of time … Why don’t we just pay this money directly to the people of our country and let them buy their own health insurance?” the president said on Nov. 16.
.@POTUS: “The insurance companies are making a fortune. Their stock is up over 1,000% over a short period of time… Why don’t we just pay this money directly to the people of our country and let them buy their own health insurance?” pic.twitter.com/8DruTrBBDh
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) November 17, 2025
“For decades, politicians have failed to stand up to medical industry executives who refuse to provide upfront prices to patients. Thankfully, those days are ending,” Trent England, executive director of Save Our States, told the DCNF. “President Trump is pushing for transparency and accountability in health care. He has the power today to deliver real results for the American people.”
But with less than a month until the expiration of the subsidies, no official proposal has been endorsed by either the president or Republican leadership.
Meanwhile, Democrats have made the impending expiration of enhanced ACA subsidies, along with broader Republican healthcare reforms, a top midterm attack line. They warn that without an extension, premiums will surge for millions of Americans and thousands will die, framing any Republican opposition as an attempt to gut Obamacare.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Dust bin of hitory is where it should be...
whether to back a limited extension of those subsidies“
In other words make the short term covid subsidies permanent
whether to back a limited extension of those subsidies“
In other words make the short term covid subsidies permanent
whether to back a limited extension of those subsidies“
In other words make the short term covid subsidies permanent
Price transparency has existed in healthcare for at least 10 years.
The problem is that the prices posted are based on medical codes. And…there are few people who understand medical codes. In addition, very few medical procedures are identical, so it is difficult compare apples to apples.
For example, labor and delivery for an uncomplicated birth is one price. Let there be a single issue with the delivery and the price becomes 5X the uncomplicated one. And there is no way to know which one you are going to get.
Healthcare prices are complicated because the insurance companies and the government have created a system where they have to be.
I don’t know the answer, but we would be better off focusing on the shortage of doctors for basic care practices. And no one really seems to want to talk about that.
Obamacare is a pillar of Democrat grift and vote-buying. It will bankrupt the nation, but they do not care.
They also will stop at nothing to keep it from being eliminated.
So IMHO little can be done to remove Obamacare.
BUT - a lot can be done to incentive doctors and users to leave it, for a completely free-market system. Allow an alternative to steadily grow alongside bloated Obamacare.
“I don’t know the answer, but we would be better off focusing on the shortage of doctors for basic care practices. And no one really seems to want to talk about that.”
My suggestion:
Create a Medical Service modelled on the military services for supplying doctors and nurses.
Say a young person wants to become a doctor or nurse but cannot afford medical school. They could join the Medical Service right out of high school and be sent to any one of many medical or nursing schools all across the country at government taxpayer’s expense. They sign a contract similar to the military contract that obligates them to ten years of government service after they graduate medical or nursing school. After that ten year service is fulfilled they can go into private practice or sign on for another period of service.
There would be a command structure just like the military with higher ranking senior doctors and nurses overseeing the newer junior members. They could be transferred and stationed anywhere they are needed just like the military folks are. Specialists could be trained or they could be contracted from the civilian world. Surgery centers, clinics and hospitals could have added spaces that the government could lease or build their own.
They would be primary care doctors for the poor and indigent all across the US and even middle class when necessary.
Private practice would still exist for those who can afford it and the insurance companies could well handle the situation.
Price transparency might help people see a glimpse of what goes on, and over time, the disgust open the door to solving the real problem. That problem is allowing sellers of medical services to charge different priced to different consumers. Government uses its enormous buying power to negotiate prices for Medicare and Medicaid that barely cover costs, if that. Then the government allows providers to grossly overcharge “independent” consumers.
Solution: By law, require providers to charge all their customers the true cost for each service, plus some reasonable percentage for O&P. Providers could have different prices from each other. Arguing that we need to preserve the existing “free market system for healthcare” is laughable. There is no free market in the healthcare system. There is only a rigged game with what is essentially fascism (government regulation using Big Insurance as its agent), with costs bloated up by Byzantine rules and bureaucracy plus “profits” for the insurance industry.
We could talk about whether requiring medical students to spend a full four years on random undergraduate degrees makes any sense...other than to lower the supply of doctors.
What the RATs are really fighting against is falling back to the pre-Covid disqualification of any family making over 4x the Federal Poverty Level for their family size from receiving a premium tax credit. Why should we subsidize the health insurance for a family making that much income?
Oh, and if they lie and lowball their projected income to get a discount, it will all have to be paid back when they file their income tax return.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.