Posted on 10/20/2025 7:16:27 AM PDT by Words Matter
Published: October 20, 2025
In the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, accurate casualty reporting has become a weapon in the information war. Hamas, a terrorist organization notorious for its disregard for human life—including that of its own people—has consistently inflated and distorted fatality numbers to portray Israel as the aggressor committing indiscriminate violence. However, recent analyses based on Hamas' own data, cross-referenced with Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) reports, reveal a starkly different reality: a highly targeted campaign by Israel that has neutralized thousands of Hamas combatants while minimizing civilian harm. This pro-Israel examination draws on credible sources to dismantle Hamas' propaganda and highlight the IDF's precision in urban warfare.
Hamas' Ministry of Health routinely publishes fatality lists that blend civilian deaths with those of fighters, natural causes, and even casualties caused by Hamas itself—such as misfired rockets or internal executions. A detailed breakdown from analyst Aizenberg, who has tracked these figures for over two years, estimates that of the approximately 58,000 deaths claimed by Hamas since October 7, 2023, a significant portion is misrepresented. Specifically, around 6,000 are natural deaths (including infant mortality), 3,000 stem from Hamas-inflicted violence (like failed rocket launches or reprisals against suspected collaborators), and at least 5,000-7,000 male combatants are deliberately omitted from official records to conceal battlefield losses.[Ref 11]
This manipulation serves a clear purpose: by excluding fighters and inflating civilian counts, Hamas aims to fuel international outrage against Israel. For instance, early in the war, Hamas claimed 70% of fatalities were women and children, a figure blindly echoed by some media outlets. Yet, when full names were released, this dropped to around 50%—and even lower when accounting for non-war-related deaths, closer to 40%.[Ref 11] Such tactics echo historical precedents; in 2009, Hamas initially admitted only 48 fighters killed, later revising it to 600-700, matching Israel's estimates.[Ref 11]
A recent revelation from Hamas' own data on orphans underscores this deceit. New statistics show adult males were killed at six times the rate of adult women—far exceeding the official 3:1 ratio in fatality lists. This discrepancy exposes thousands of male combatants (many fathers) removed from records, inadvertently revealed through orphan counts published by UNICEF and cited in outlets like The Guardian.[Ref 10] As Aizenberg notes, this "huge gap" confirms Hamas' strategy of hiding losses to maintain the illusion of resilience while blaming Israel for civilian suffering.[Ref 10]
Contrary to Hamas' narrative, Israel's military response has been remarkably precise, especially in the dense urban environment of Gaza where Hamas embeds itself among civilians—a war crime under international law. Based on IDF data corroborated by U.S. intelligence, over 23,000-24,000 Hamas combatants have been eliminated, a figure that aligns with battlefield reports of Hamas' decimation and desperate recruitment of teenagers.[Ref 11] Former U.S. President Donald Trump, in a September 2025 statement, affirmed that approximately 25,000 Hamas fighters had been killed since the October 7 attack, emphasizing the heavy toll on the group.[Ref 4]
Adjusting for Hamas' distortions, the true war-related death toll stands at around 52,000, with roughly 29,000 civilians and 23,000 combatants—yielding a civilian-to-combatant ratio of about 1.3:1.[Ref 11] This is exceptionally low compared to other urban conflicts, such as U.S.-led operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, where ratios often exceeded 3:1 or higher. Even Hamas' data shows 73% of combat-age fatalities are male, rising higher with the latest orphan revelations, proving Israel's focus on combatants rather than indiscriminate bombing.[Ref 10]
Claims of vast unreported bodies "under the rubble" are implausible; families have incentives to report deaths for compensation, and a two-month ceasefire allowed for such updates.[Ref 11]
Under international law, Hamas—not Israel—bears full legal responsibility for all civilian harm in Gaza. As Prof. Louis René Beres, renowned international law expert and author, explains in his May 8, 2025 analysis, Hamas' systematic use of human shields and placement of military assets in schools, hospitals, and populated areas constitutes "perfidy"—a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions (Article 147) and Hague Regulations.[Ref 20] This illegal tactic exculpates Israel from any responsibility for resulting civilian casualties, transferring all legal culpability to the terrorists themselves.
When the IDF targets a hospital being used as a Hamas command center or an ambulance sheltering fighters, any civilian deaths are the direct legal responsibility of Hamas, not Israel. Beres emphasizes: "In law, although bombs killing Palestinian noncombatants may be fired by Israeli military forces, the criminal perpetrators are those who committed perfidy."[Ref 20] This principle applies universally—every state has a legal obligation to support Israel's self-defense against such jihadist criminality, as codified in Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries and the universal law of nations.
Hamas' standard counter-charge of "disproportionality" is legally baseless. International law's proportionality rule requires only that force be militarily necessary—not equivalent in harm. Beres notes that even the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki meet this standard, making Hamas' accusations not just wrong, but a deliberate manipulation to exploit civilian deaths for propaganda.[Ref 20] Perfidy adds a second layer of illegality to Hamas' terrorism, threatening the global legal order itself.
There is no greater just cause than Israel's battle against Hamas, the terror group that led the October 7, 2023, massacre of 1,200 babies, children, women, and men in the most barbaric way, and took 251 others hostage, with the goal of doing the same to the remaining approximately 7 million Jews in the country, including around 2 million children.[Ref 12] This right to self-defense, rooted in international law, is amplified by Hamas' perfidy, which legally shields Israel from blame while condemning the terrorists.[Ref 20]
John Spencer, director of urban warfare at the West Point Military Academy, has stated that Israel "has implemented more measures to prevent civilian casualties than any other military in history."[Ref 18] As an expert who has studied every urban conflict, Spencer highlights unprecedented precautions such as mass SMS/phone calls, "roof-knocking," real-time evacuation maps, daily tactical pauses, deconfliction hotlines, and widespread leaflet drops—measures that further immunize Israel under international law despite Hamas' illegal shielding.[Ref 19]
The evidence is clear: no fighting force has ever achieved Israel's success in urban combat while maintaining such a low civilian-to-combatant ratio. Studies from the Henry Jackson Society and Honest Reporting, combined with Hamas' own March 2025 casualty revisions, confirm thousands of combatants—not innocent civilians—among the dead.[Ref 12] Col. Richard Kemp notes typical urban war ratios of 9:1 civilians-to-combatants; Israel's is 1:2—the most impressive in history.[Ref 12]
Yet critics like Piers Morgan and Joe Rogan ignore this legal reality, failing to propose alternatives as Hamas holds 56 hostages, including 20 believed alive.[Ref 12] Israel's ratio is even more remarkable given Hamas' strategy of embedding in hospitals and schools—actions that, per Beres, make Hamas legally culpable for every civilian death.[Ref 20] Israel retains the unqualified right to stop Hamas rockets and rescue hostages.
Suggestions for Palestinian Authority control of Gaza ignore its antisemitic history and 80%+ support for October 7 among its population.[Ref 12] Israel's legal right to its homeland—affirmed by San Remo (1920), League of Nations (1922), Anglo-American Treaty (1925), and UN (1947)—is unassailable.[Ref 12] There is no alternative: support Israel's moral, just, and legally protected war.[Ref 12,20]
The tragedy of civilian deaths lies squarely with Hamas' perfidy, which international law identifies as the root cause.[Ref 20] By fighting from hospitals, schools, and homes without uniforms, Hamas ensures casualties to exploit for propaganda. Israel counters with extraordinary warnings via leaflets, calls, and corridors—even compromising operations to save lives.
Aizenberg's analyses consistently expose Hamas' manipulated lists, with hundreds of "confirmed" deaths later removed.[Ref 14,15] Hamas officials admit including natural deaths, confirming the deceit.[Ref 13]
The truth—bolstered by international law—reveals Israel's defensive war of restraint against genocidal foes. The IDF's achievements neutralize 25,000+ terrorists with an unmatched 1.3:1 ratio, demonstrating moral and military superiority. Hamas' deceptions, amplified by biased voices, prolong Gazan suffering.
As Trump affirmed, Hamas has "paid a big price."[Ref 4] Legally exonerated and morally compelled, Israel must dismantle Hamas for lasting peace. The law doesn't lie—only Hamas does.[Ref 20]
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
[snip] A detailed breakdown from analyst Aizenberg, who has tracked these figures for over two years, estimates that of the approximately 58,000 deaths claimed by Hamas since October 7, 2023, a significant portion is misrepresented. Specifically, around 6,000 are natural deaths (including infant mortality), 3,000 stem from Hamas-inflicted violence (like failed rocket launches or reprisals against suspected collaborators), and at least 5,000-7,000 male combatants are deliberately omitted from official records to conceal battlefield losses. [/snip]
Cheers
the IDF did a tremendous job, the Fakestinian Occupation terrorist problem remains (and is now reassembling, rebuilding, and rearming) because of the politicians (both in Jerusalem and WashedUpDC) protecting (and reprovisioning) Hamas.
“Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable evil.”
Thomas Paine
As long as articles keep appearing around Israeli genocide and IDF killing of civilians I’ll keep posting this piece of reality about civilian deaths in warfare. The very fact Hamas and Hezbollah say they can count the number killed means these people were within the boundaries of their control. Any realistic appraisal of their behavior would see they consider civilians as so many biodegradable sandbags possessing utility as political props.
The idea of “bringing terrorists to justice” is a breathtaking mockery of any civilized understanding of justice. All four Geneva Accords deal with terrorist organizations and they find no sanctuary anywhere. The feral psychopaths of Hamas and Hezbollah never display the civility required for Geneva Convention definitions for militia, armed force, or volunteer corps, but are so dissociated from country or culture, so committed to butchery that they best match Webster’s definition for a virus. They are not insurgents or freedom fighters, and when captured, certainly not prisoners of war. These killers are not members of an organized resistance movement carrying arms openly, and they have no distinctive identifier. The Geneva Conventions place terrorists beyond the pale, discuss no limits in dealing with their depredations. So, their eradication would come closest to achieving meaningful justice.
The Geneva Conventions, which attempt to grasp rational, moral threads to apply during wars’ barbarity formed the basis for our operations. For my Navy experience helping to pulverize a major enemy base in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, I especially liked the obvious reading of Articles 28 and 29 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The VC were responsible for any civilian deaths in the base our ship shelled. Those civilians qualified as Protected Persons within the enemy’s physical control and could not be used to render certain points and areas immune from military operations. The Convention articles are as follows:
ART. 28. — The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.
ART. 29. — The Party to the conflict in whose hands protected persons may be, is responsible for the treatment accorded to them by its agents, irrespective of any individual responsibility which may be incurred.
The passages furnished the basis for rules of engagement we followed when attacking a legitimate military target. The base the SEAL team identified in the U Minh Forest had been continuously used at least since the Vietnamese had fought the Japanese, so families of the VC would have been residents as well. Distance provided me with the blessing of avoiding the cleanup afterwards for the mess I helped create with our 445 rounds of 3”50cal. However, I am certain our task force was effective. We helped to permanently shatter the last intact VC main force unit, forcing it to surrender control the region.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.