Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/04/2025 8:10:12 AM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John Semmens

Physical fitness saves lives, DEI takes lives.


2 posted on 10/04/2025 8:21:41 AM PDT by Ronald77 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
One notes that the article links to GOPBriefing Room where the site notes you are a "Hero Member ***** Posts: 31"

That site also asks for donations, as does Free Republic.


3 posted on 10/04/2025 8:22:28 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

I don’t know how real any of those quotes are, but combat is stressful. (Duh!) Physical fitness supports endurance and mental acuity. Fat sedentary officers have no appreciation of the tasks they are undertaking or ordering others to undertake.


4 posted on 10/04/2025 8:24:02 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Nullius in verba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
I watched the females of a field MI unit trying to set up their giant girls tent (35 man tent?), eventually the males in their unit had to come over and do it for them, that was after the males were exhausted from laughing at the comic scene at first.

Support needs to be fit and strong also.


5 posted on 10/04/2025 8:27:25 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

We had a guy in our unit (C 2/504 Abn Inf) that couldn’t physically keep up.

They transferred him to a non-combat unit in about a month.

This was in 1979.


6 posted on 10/04/2025 8:27:32 AM PDT by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
"They're not going to be storming enemy positions or flying combat missions. All they have to do is give orders."

Wrong! What a stupid comment!

"Why shouldn't folks of divergent abilities be participating in active combat or in the ranks of those giving the orders?"

They can. Nobody disagrees. They must rise to the standards established. If they can, fine.

These stupid remarks merely expose the level of stupidity of those who criticize Hegseth and Trump. The dangerous level of stupidity.

7 posted on 10/04/2025 8:33:41 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("Break free from the temptations and shackles of this world." Erika Kirk, September 21, 2025)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

The military does many things that are not strictly necessary. They polish the brass, mop the floors, salute the officers.

This is done to maintain discipline and control It is a whole culture that comes in very handy in actual fighting.


8 posted on 10/04/2025 8:34:07 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Harris is an idiot. During my 22 years of service in a noncombat role we understood that there might come a time when everyone would need to pick up a gun and become a warrior...and we trained for that.


10 posted on 10/04/2025 8:37:04 AM PDT by Hootowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens


I don't know about you, but one look at these guys, I mean, er, personnel, tells me my country is secure.
11 posted on 10/04/2025 8:41:01 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
Ironically, then President Trump had a Navy hospital ship with the capacity to house 500 to 1,000 patients sent to New York. Unfortunately, virtually no covid patients were sent to the ship by New York government officials. Mayor Bill de Blasio explained "I didn't think it would be good optics to let Trump be credited as some sort of savior for the ill. At the time the narrative we were working on was that Trump was too incompetent to deal with the pandemic."

Too unbelievable for satire, ergo it must be true (and should be news.)

Thanks, John, for another fine commentary, disguised as satire.

17 posted on 10/04/2025 9:05:46 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never...in nothing, great or small...Winston ChurchIill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Combat planning and leadership have a level of stress all it’s own, and those that are physically fit can do it for much longer. Look at the numbers of WWII, Korea, and Vietnam SR officers who were returned to the states because of severe medical problems brought on by stress.

Stress kills, and physically fit leaders fare better under continuous stress. The same applies to the corporate world, that is why many executives have mandatory exercise and lifestyle programs.

If you want to be a couch potato, you have no business in the military.

Yes, it’s harder as you age to stay fit; it requires discipline and dedication. We have lost that and this administration is trying to get it back.

Yeah!


18 posted on 10/04/2025 9:08:59 AM PDT by EdgeOfDarkness (EdgeOfDarkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Combat fitness needs to be different from combat support fitness and combat service support fitness. Truth is, they are that way right now, naturally.

If you visit any of the major combat training posts, like Ft. Bragg, Ft. Benning, etc., they seem to be exercise fanatics. Highly aggressive, highly extroverted places.

Other posts have other priorities than exercising.

This gets chaotic when leaders want all branches to be as fit as 11b infantry. There needs to be slack for those who fail fitness standards but excel in other ways. This happened a LOT when the “fat man” program dictate threw out hundreds or thousands of exceptional, superior or even unique soldiers because they were overweight. This DID NOT help the Army.

I remember seeing an anonymous parody of that, called the “ugly man” program, that proposed kicking out soldiers if they didn’t meet beauty standards, because you have to be pretty to be good war fighters.

It’s common sense.


21 posted on 10/04/2025 9:14:56 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (If you see "Acheta" protein in a product, know that it has been adulterated with insect protein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

“”What difference does it make if a general or admiral is too fat to pass any of the fitness requirements that front-line soldiers and sailors are expected to meet?” one source wanted to know.”

Some truth to that but one aspect of leadership is to set an example.

I think it also depends on the level of obesity. Just being overweight is one thing but severe obesity is another.


24 posted on 10/04/2025 9:29:18 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Best, most competent, 1st Sgt I ever had was overweight, and I doubt he could pass a PT test. However, he was outstanding at getting the troops up, getting them fed, and on the road. That was more important to me than how many pullups he could do.


26 posted on 10/04/2025 9:36:11 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Do you want warfighters or fluff bunny targets? r
Retention is higher with the warfighter as a goal.


27 posted on 10/04/2025 9:39:32 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The dawn cracks hard like a bull whip and it ain't taking no lip from the night before" Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Any general needs to be on the front line occasionally. See StorminNorman. Chubby, but fit.

If all you do is warm a chair, you are an analyst, not a general.


30 posted on 10/04/2025 9:46:59 AM PDT by bobbo666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

https://x.com/i/status/1974157961171013970


31 posted on 10/04/2025 10:08:25 AM PDT by Bobbyvotes (Work is worship! .... Bhagavad Geeta. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

The idiocy of these anonymous ex-Pentagon employees is on full display. First, the article doesn’t say whether these ex employees are civilian or military. If civilian, they don’t know sh-t. If military they are also ignorant about the military and its mission. But the big thing they don’t seem to understand is leadership. A good leader doesn’t ask his men/women to do something he wouldn’t do. He/she leads by example. But that point is lots on these ex employees, democrats and Congress critters.


33 posted on 10/04/2025 10:25:51 AM PDT by falcon99 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson