Skip to comments.
Gun Rights Update: 90% of States Now Have Open Carry
AmmoLand ^
| September 15, 2025
| Dean Weingarten
Posted on 09/23/2025 5:32:39 AM PDT by marktwain

Open carry of handguns as of September 10, 2025
The number of states that ban the open carry of firearms has again been reduced to five. Before 2022, it was four, but New Jersey criminalized open carry, even with a permit, in 2022. New Jersey permit requirements and processes for obtaining a permit are being challenged in the courts. Connecticut banned open carry in 2023, making six states that generally banned open carry. Open carry with a permit is allowed in some rural parts of California. The California ban is being challenged in the Ninth Circuit.
On September 10, 2025, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal published a unanimous opinion that the Florida ban on the open carry of firearms in public is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, and can not be enforced in Florida. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeir supports the Florida case and has decided not to appeal it to the state Supreme Court. On a Youtube video, at about 1:13, reporter for 10 Tampa Bay, Jennifer Titus says “Florida’s Attorney General says he doesn’t plan to have the case heard again.” Florida Governor Ron DeSantis says the court decision “aligns state policy with my long-held position and with the vast majority of states throughout the union.” This means the case becomes binding law in Florida.
The general ban on the open carry of firearms in Florida was relatively new. It was enacted in 1987, after heavy lobbying by Janet Reno, who became famous for her part in the massacre at Waco, Texas, during the Clinton administration. The open carry ban was part of a legislative compromise that enacted the extremely successful shall-issue concealed carry permit scheme
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; carry; fl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: Sacajaweau
Registration of guns is the first step toward confiscation of guns. Unconstitutional. “Shall not be infringed.”
41
posted on
09/23/2025 8:03:58 AM PDT
by
Tudorfly
(All things are possible within the will of God.)
To: CodeToad
They didn’t say it wasn’t common practice. It was considered “ungentlemanly” to carry concealed, but yes, it happened probably far more often than most realized.
42
posted on
09/23/2025 9:08:19 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” -Hamilton)
To: rarestia
“It was considered “ungentlemanly” to carry concealed”
BY whom?? Liberals today say that too.
43
posted on
09/23/2025 9:39:40 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
To: rarestia
It was also considered ungentlemanly to take cover behind a tree, or rock and shoot the british lieutenant, or gerneral first, rather than stand in a “proper” line and exchange musket rounds.
Glad we didn’t follow THOSE rules!
Personally, prefer CCW, BUT... now that FL has voided laws against open carry, I’m looking forward to wearing a drop holstered hicap .45 1911... just...well...because.
Will wait for the Barney Fife’s to get up to speed and harass others who venture sticking their toe in those waters. Not interested in suicide-by-Fife in my quest to live to 99.
44
posted on
09/23/2025 10:35:12 AM PDT
by
Z28.310
(does not comply with others)
To: Z28.310
Will wait for the Barney Fife’s to get up to speed In many ways, uniformed, uninformed, ignorant, arrogant public servants are the biggest problem we armed citizens face as armed citizens.
We can deal with common criminals in the way common criminals deserved to be dealt.
When uniformed, uninformed, ignorant, arrogant public servants violate the law and our rights, even to the point of assault, battery, armed robbery, and kidnapping, there's very little we can do to them ... the government doesn't allow us to hold them accountable for their crimes.
45
posted on
09/23/2025 10:43:04 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: CodeToad
Start here...
https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/assets/1813,-la,-acts-passed-by-the-general-assembly-of-the-state-of-louisiana,-1st-legis.,-2nd-sess.,-act-of-mar.-25,-1813,—1-3.pdf
Or here...
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23383191
If you don’t already have an account, they are easy enough to set up and give you access to a lot material.
Again, as stated... many of these early laws were later struck down or revised as they rightly should be... However, it does point out the language and attitudes towards carrying.
We are fighting the same fight for our rights today against the same kinds of people trying to keep us weak.
46
posted on
09/23/2025 10:47:35 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(A Psalm in napalm...)
To: CodeToad
Take 2 minutes, ask Grok or ChatGPT. I got at least 10 links from each citing articles wherein 19th century etiquette considered concealed carry “unmanly.” It’s not a modern idea. I’m all for concealed carry, and I don’t care about historical precedent; but there’s plenty to support that social norms were that it was considered impolite.
47
posted on
09/23/2025 10:49:49 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” -Hamilton)
To: Z28.310
I’m not going to stop carrying concealed. Just glad we finally got out of our own way with this stupid prohibition.
48
posted on
09/23/2025 10:50:26 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” -Hamilton)
To: Z28.310
Ugh... drop holsters... Might be fine if you are on a motorcycle or on horseback... but they suck for everywhere else.
I’m a, ahem... larger person and Smartcarry and other IWB holsters aren’t always that comfortable. Off body holsters, like fanny packs, have their own issues that IMO minimize their affectiveness.
I prefer a comfortable OWB holster with thumb-break retention that I can cover with a jacket, overshirt, etc... I’m also left-handed... so I don’t have nearly as many options as right-handers do. This has perhaps colored my opinions a bit, so take that for what it’s worth.
49
posted on
09/23/2025 10:51:43 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(A Psalm in napalm...)
To: Sacajaweau
You actually need permits to gather in MANY instances. Your name is on your writings and speeches and you’re listed in church records.
If the gun gets stolen and you report it...it is to the owners advantage.
~~~
Breaking this down...
*Permits for parades, protests & events using public spaces & thru fares isn’t registration to exercise free speach, or religion. Fail.
*church records are part of voluntary participation, not government mandated registration. Fail again.
*if a firearm is stolen, it is wise to report such. No infringing registration is required to be wise. Fail once again.
You have consistently failed to make a valid point to support your suggestion for a federal gun registration and still have not addressed the “shall not be infringed” part.
With that in mind, two possibilities remain;
1-you havent thought this through
2-your’re merely parroting Marxist talking points.
In the spirit of civility I’ll assume that #1 is the case.
50
posted on
09/23/2025 10:58:24 AM PDT
by
Z28.310
(does not comply with others)
To: Dead Corpse
On the Mc!
Other than that, normal is ITWB for shorts & light attire and OTW for full frame, with forward cant.
51
posted on
09/23/2025 11:01:08 AM PDT
by
Z28.310
(does not comply with others)
To: marktwain
Oregon state law allows open carry, but open carry is banned in all the large cities.
52
posted on
09/23/2025 12:27:56 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson