Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buried Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day and the Results are Staggering!
Gateway Pundit ^ | September 10, 2025 | Vigilant Fox

Posted on 09/10/2025 7:17:45 AM PDT by Red Badger

In 2016, Dr. Marcus Zervos agreed to the unthinkable: test the vaccinated against the unvaccinated.

Convinced it would prove vaccines safe, he vowed to publish the results no matter what.

Those results never saw the light of day—until now.

Here’s what the buried study revealed.

Meet Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit. He’s as pro-vaccine as they come.

In 2016, he crossed paths with health freedom journalist Del Bigtree, who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades: a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

Dr. Zervos agreed to run the study, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”

In early 2020, Bigtree and team received a copy of the study. It was a retrospective vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison, examining the long-term health outcomes of 18,468 subjects.

Its title was “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study.”

Here’s what the results revealed:

Vaccinated children were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis than the unvaccinated.

They also had a sixfold increase in acute and chronic ear infections.

Speech disorders were 4.47 times higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated.

Meanwhile, the unvaccinated cohort showed zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.

“This is devastating.”

Attorney Aaron Siri of ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) notes that this study should have been “rushed to publication on an emergency basis.”

But that didn’t happen.

VIDEO AT LINK..............

Why? Because publishing this would have ruined Zervos’ career.

As Siri testified at a Senate vaccine hearing on Tuesday, the overall findings showed that “after 10 years, 17% of unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of vaccinated children had at least one.”

That’s a more than threefold increase in the risk of chronic health conditions among the vaccinated.

“The only real problem with this study,” Siri stated, “is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.”

Huge credit goes to Del Bigtree, The Highwire, Attorney Aaron Siri, and others for 1) convincing Dr. Zervos to conduct this study and 2) bringing it to light.

The full documentary, titled An Inconvenient Study, is slated for release on October 3.

Until then, you can read Siri’s full testimony about this buried study and more here.


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: 00001bsstudy; kidsvaxx; vaccines; vaxx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2025 7:17:45 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Why doesn’t RFK publicize this?


2 posted on 09/10/2025 7:22:34 AM PDT by silent majority rising (When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; Jane Long; ransomnote; nickcarraway
Related, from 2020, similar conclusion, but not the aforementioned study, I think...

Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders

If you're in a hurry, scroll to the conclusion.

Holy cr@p.

3 posted on 09/10/2025 7:36:38 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Siri testified? What about Alexa?


4 posted on 09/10/2025 7:44:54 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“The only real problem with this study,” Siri stated, “is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.”

"Big Pharma told me that there is no money to be made in healthy people, but a fortune to be made if we make people sick". /truth

5 posted on 09/10/2025 7:47:49 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Lol.. yeah, I was thinking that I better not read this out loud.. or it would drive Siri nuts.... although, she (it) likes to activate herself (itself) pretty often (when it mistakes another word for “Siri”).


6 posted on 09/10/2025 7:53:50 AM PDT by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I think the outcome is worse for the COVID vax.

My family has demanded I receive the latest COVID vax before I visit. I am not taking a further shot ever again.

I told them I am willing to take a COVID test every morning before I come over. If that is not acceptable, let me know now b/c I’m canceling my trip.

So far they have agreed to the testing. I have 8 boxes of tests.


7 posted on 09/10/2025 8:01:52 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"The only real problem with this study,” Siri stated, “is that its findings did not fit the ...

talking points propaganda, the settled dogma, the lockstep conformity model of obedience to the system minded by unassailable experts, and so forth.

Basically a religion, its movers and shakers being the devoted adherents working for their lord, always on the prowl for heretics.

Logan's Run.

Few ever catch on.

At least it explains why there's never any cure for cancer -- who expects the Establishment to police its own membership? It only exists to keep itself established, so the more cancer the better.

8 posted on 09/10/2025 8:05:41 AM PDT by Ezekiel (🆘️ "Come fly with US". 🔴 Ingenuity -- because the Son of David begins with MARS ♂️, aka every man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Your family is way out of line.

Even my hard core pro vaxx relatives know better than to pull that garbage on me.

They know I have zero tolerance for it.

Our visits go just fine.


9 posted on 09/10/2025 8:06:52 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

The only thing Government ever protects is itself....................


10 posted on 09/10/2025 8:08:52 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

We have some spare boxes of tests. Only because we paid for them with taxes. It may be harder for some folks to say but, if no vax means you don’t want me around, I can deal with that.


11 posted on 09/10/2025 8:11:50 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍! Winning currently!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Agreed. They are vax crazy.

I have already decided that if me refusing the vax means I can’t attend Thanksgiving, Christmas - or visit my granddaughter, so be it!

I am fully prepared for this outcome and am more convinced than ever that the vax is extremely dangerous.

The controversy over this vax has torn families apart, mine included.


12 posted on 09/10/2025 8:13:29 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

“Related, from 2020, similar conclusion, but not the aforementioned study, I think...

Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders”

To evaluate any study you must consider the design of the study and confounding factors. One factor might be the relative intelligence of the parents of children who do not get vaccinated. The reason for not having their children vaccinated could be that the parents were too busy or uninterested in providing medical care for their children. They might also be uninterested in reading to their children or providing educational support for their children. They might have a more limited vocabulary and lower ability to understand instructional material. They might be unable to provide the environment conducive to intellectual development. To analyze this, the study should measure the educational attainment of the parents, simply ask them if they are high school, college, graduate, etc. All these factors could cause a “developmental delay”. That’s why those who are against vaccines focus on ambiguous conditions like “autism” which they claim are caused by “vaccines”. What is a “developmental delay”? Development of what? Ability to speak, to read? Also, if “vaccines” are causing something, it would be helpful if there were some physical mechanism identified. There are 30+ vaccines being given, which is the one that causes “autism”? Do they ALL cause autism? Or only some of them? What is the mechanism by which the vaccine causes autism? conveniently, we cannot study the developmental delay of rats in a cage, they never “develop”, they are all autistic, they are rats. So the vaccine/autism argument cannot be disproven or proven. IMHO there are come vaccines that are stupid, like HPV, which is a rash with no possible long term serious negative consequences. The vaccine safety for this should be 100 percent, no one should ever die from a vaccine that is supposed to prevent you from getting a rash. Other vaccines are designed to prevent ridiculous invented conditions that affect only 1 in 100,000 people, so the safety must be 100 percent. But why lump mumps, tetanus, rubella, measles together with a rash? probably 10 vaccines is the right amount, and the rest are just to make big money for big pharma.


13 posted on 09/10/2025 8:14:43 AM PDT by brookwood (America Was Built By MS-13. We Are A Nation Of MS-13.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I have “free” ones sent to me by my health care provider. They now cost $11/box from the same source.

I am willing to pay for them to avoid taking the vax. If it means I cannot see my new granddaughter, so be it.


14 posted on 09/10/2025 8:15:03 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

“My family has demanded I receive the latest COVID vax before I visit. I am not taking a further shot ever again. I told them I am willing to take a COVID test every morning before I come over. If that is not acceptable, let me know now b/c I’m canceling my trip.”

personally, i wouldn’t visit such a nutty family ...


15 posted on 09/10/2025 8:22:38 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
VAX:

Non-VAX:


16 posted on 09/10/2025 8:23:44 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Got it.


17 posted on 09/10/2025 8:24:54 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍! Winning currently!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Where did they find unvaccinated children


18 posted on 09/10/2025 8:27:13 AM PDT by daveb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

My advantage in dealing with my relatives on this topic is that I was known to be anti-vaxx for decades.

My views on this topic were non negotiable—so if they wanted to cut me off they had the chance many years ago...


19 posted on 09/10/2025 8:28:21 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bump


20 posted on 09/10/2025 8:40:28 AM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson