Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas sued over its lab-grown meat ban
Texas Tribune ^ | 09/03/2025 | Jessica Shuran Yu

Posted on 09/03/2025 1:32:06 PM PDT by DFG

Two cultivated meat companies have filed a lawsuit against officials in Texas over the law that bans the sales of lab-grown meat in the state for two years.

California-based companies UPSIDE Foods, which makes cultivated chicken, and Wildtype, which makes cultivated salmon are suing Attorney General Ken Paxton, Texas Department of State Health Services, Texas Health and Human Services, and Travis County, accusing them of government overreach.

“This law has nothing to do with protecting public health and safety and everything to do with protecting conventional agriculture from innovative out-of-state competition,” said Paul Sherman, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit law firm that is representing UPSIDE Foods and Wildtype. “That is not a legitimate use of government power.”

The background In June, lawmakers passed Senate Bill 261, which bans the sale of lab-grown meat in Texas for two years. Lab-grown meat, also known as cell cultivated meat or cultured meat, is made from taking animal cells and growing them in an incubator or bioreactor until they form an edible product.

Lawmakers expressed concerns during the Senate committee hearing on the bill that cultured meat will disrupt traditional family farms in Texas, as well as concerns over product labelling and safety.

The ban went into effect on Monday.

Before the ban, there was only one restaurant in Texas selling cultured protein. In the last month and a half, OTOKO, a high-end sushi restaurant in Austin, included Wildtype salmon into the omakase menu.

Why cultured meat companies are suing Cultured meat company founders and their lawyers held a press conference Wednesday morning to announce a lawsuit over SB 261, saying the ban is “unconstitutional” and “un-American.”

“We do believe that Americans should have the freedom to choose what to eat,” said Justin Kolbeck, a co-founder of Wildtype. “We think even if you hate the idea of cultivated seafood, we hope you agree that we're on a slippery slope if we're handing over intensely personal choices like what to feed ourselves and our families to the government.”

Sherman, the lead counsel on the case, added that the federal government has approved cultivated meat as safe for consumers. In 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave approval for two companies, UPSIDE Foods and GOOD Meat, to sell cell-cultivated chicken and a year later, the U.S. Department for Agriculture (USDA) approved the label of “cell-cultivated chicken” for the products.

As of July, four companies have received regulatory clearance to sell cultured meat in the United States, according to the Good Food Institute.

Texas lawmakers and the Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association, who testified in favor of SB 261 before it was passed, said that they are concerned about the safety of cultured meat products.

“The USDA and The FDA have agreed that these products are safe,” Sherman said. “If that's not good enough for some consumers, there's a simple solution, don't eat it.”

Kolbeck added that Wildtype salmon doesn’t have the contaminants that are commonly found in traditional seafood, such as heavy metals, antibiotics, microplastics, and other pollutants.

“Making America healthy requires innovation,” Kolbeck said.

What cattle raisers and lawmakers are saying The Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association did not immediately respond to a request for comment but previously, Carl Ray Polk Jr., the president of the association, said in an interview that SB 261 isn’t about banning competition.

“We're not pushing back on these products because we have a concern about competition,” Polk said, adding that the cattle industry has welcomed competition with poultry, fish, and plant-based proteins.

Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, the author of the bill, said that there are “concerns over the transparency and labeling, risk of contamination, and long term health impacts of consuming cell culture products” when he presented the bill during a March Senate committee hearing.

Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, asked the Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association if they see the lab-grown meat companies as part of the Make America Healthy Again Movement or against it.

“I would see the lab grown meat as against it,” said Dan Gattis, a rancher and lawyer from Georgetown.

Broader impact Texas is the seventh state to ban lab-grown meat and this is the second lawsuit in the nation over such bans. Last year, the Institute for Justice also filed a similar lawsuit in Florida. If Texas’s ban on cultured meat sales is lifted, Wildtype said in the lawsuit that they would immediately resume selling their cultivated salmon at OTOKO and reach out to other chefs in Texas to pursue partnerships. However, the state may not immediately see a surge in the sales of cultured proteins. Cultured meat scientists and experts agree that the industry is not ready to sell their products at a large scale yet.


TOPICS: Agriculture
KEYWORDS: food; lawfare; meat; texas

1 posted on 09/03/2025 1:32:06 PM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DFG

It’s not food but a manufactured product that hasn’t been sufficiently tested on humans. Texas is right to ban it.


2 posted on 09/03/2025 1:35:15 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

You’ll never know Who’s cells fell into the vats


3 posted on 09/03/2025 1:36:46 PM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Interesting concept. Is it really meat if it is grown in a lab? What is really a potential can they use the same cheap process to grow human tissue for medical use, or in the case of Haiti, for dinner?


4 posted on 09/03/2025 1:37:01 PM PDT by Organic Panic ('Was I molested. I think so' - Ashley Biden in response to her father joining her in the shower. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

And people gripe about GMO grains...

This stuff is TRULY ‘Frankenfood’.

No, ma’am.


5 posted on 09/03/2025 1:43:03 PM PDT by larrytown (A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: larrytown

Best arnold voice: It’s a Toomah!


6 posted on 09/03/2025 1:46:59 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DFG

It’s-a tumor….


7 posted on 09/03/2025 1:48:43 PM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

the word “meat” should be banned in the product name ...

accurate labeling would call the stuff cancer nuggets since it’s grown in vats of “immortal” cells, i.e., cancer cells ....


8 posted on 09/03/2025 2:01:42 PM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

If I don’t want it, I won’t buy it. So tired of these endless bans by nanny-state governments pretending they know what’s best for us. Let the market decide.


9 posted on 09/03/2025 2:05:37 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

It should be banned everywhere. It is gross and disgusting.


10 posted on 09/03/2025 2:30:30 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

It should be banned because they market it as meat. It isn’t, and some people will be duped.


11 posted on 09/03/2025 2:32:43 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Government approved during the reign of Biden’s handler.


12 posted on 09/03/2025 3:10:13 PM PDT by hoosierham (Freedom isnt free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Read the labels on those fake meats .... toxic chemicals and ingredients. Essentially chemical sewage.


13 posted on 09/03/2025 3:10:45 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Trump has arrived and it is awesome to have a real President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
It should be banned because they market it as meat. It isn’t, and some people will be duped.

That's an argument for clear labeling and advertising regulation, not banning.
14 posted on 09/03/2025 3:11:06 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DFG

They are wasting their time. No real need to ban it, nobody buys it.


15 posted on 09/03/2025 3:11:39 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Trump has arrived and it is awesome to have a real President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: larrytown

Best arnold voice: It’s a Toomah!


16 posted on 09/03/2025 5:31:58 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Tumor-based quasifood.


17 posted on 09/03/2025 6:58:05 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
Texas sued over its lab-grown meat ban

Updated version of the traditional Texan witticism:

"He's all hat, and no petri dish!"

Regards,

18 posted on 09/03/2025 11:40:17 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson