I have been saying Watergate was a Media coup for years.
It appears the “Deep State” and the old dominant media were in cahoots for quite a while.
Obviously they aren’t considering the deep state’s assassination of JFK. Now that was a take down.
The Deep State’s man inside the White House was none other than John Dean.
BFL
Spiro Agnew, IMHO, was also a victim. He had to be taken out first. Otherwise impeaching Nixon would have been pointless. From their prospective he was even worse. There’s NO WAY they would have impeached Nixon if Spiro Agnew had still been Vice President.
Watched
Damned by their own boasting
Uniparty
AND
Media
I listened to it coming out of these scumbags own mouths.
Anyone still alive deserves to go and die in jail especially the media scumbags.
They don't know what hit them.
They're still trying to figure it out.
It took them 608 days from the largest share of the popular vote for the Republican Party in any presidential election (November 7, 1972) to resignation.
Wrong. Nixon took himself down — by failing to fire his criminal staffers as soon as he discovered what they did. And by not burning the tapes of his conversations with staffers soon as their existence became known.
If Nixon had been a Democrat the MSM would have circled the wagons and Watergate would have blown over in one new cycle.
Many years ago I fellow I knew with a prophetic gift said that Nixon was only not supposed to be removed, but the Church didn’t pray. Makes sense now.
https://www.population-security.org/rockefeller/001_population_growth_and_the_american_future.htm
March 27, 1972
To the President and Congress of the United States:
I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.
After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.
The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.
To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.
Respectfully submitted for the Commission,
John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Chairman
President Nixon’s response: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-about-the-report-the-commission-population-growth-and-the-american-future
Statement About the Report of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future
May 05, 1972
THE Commission on Population Growth and the American Future has formally presented its report to me today, thus completing its 2 years of work.
The men and women on this panel have performed a valuable public service in identifying and examining a wide range of problems related to population, and have contributed to an emerging debate of great significance to the future of our Nation.
I wish to thank the able and energetic Chairman of the Commission, Mr. John D. Rockefeller 3d, for his tireless efforts, not only on this Commission but in other capacities, to focus the Nation’s attention on these important issues.
The extensive public discussion already generated by this report clearly indicates the need to continue research in areas touching on population growth and distribution.
While I do not plan to comment extensively on the contents and recommendations of the report, I do feel that it is important that the public know my views on some of the issues raised.
In particular, I want to reaffirm and reemphasize that I do not support unrestricted abortion policies. As I stated on April 3, 1971, when I revised abortion policies in military hospitals, I consider abortion an unacceptable form of population control. In my judgment, unrestricted abortion policies would demean human life. I also want to make it clear that I do not support the unrestricted distribution of family planning services and devices to minors. Such measures would do nothing to preserve and strengthen close family relationships.
I have a basic faith that the American people themselves will make sound judgments regarding family size and frequency of births, judgments that are conducive both to the public interest and to personal family goals–and I believe in the right of married couples to make these judgments for themselves.
While disagreeing with the general thrust of some of the Commission’s recommendations, I wish to extend my thanks to the members of the Commission for their work and for having assembled much valuable information.
The findings and conclusions of the Commission should be of great value in assisting governments at all levels to formulate policy. At the Federal level, through our recent reorganization of the Executive Office of the President, we have the means through the Domestic Council and the Office of Management and Budget to follow up on the Commission’s report. The recommendations of the Commission will be taken into account as we formulate our national growth and population research policies, and our agency budgets through these processes for the years ahead.
Many of the questions raised by the report cannot be answered purely on the basis of fact, but rather involve moral judgments about which reasonable men will disagree. I hope that the discussions ahead will be informed ones, so that we all will be better able to face these questions relating to population in full knowledge of the consequences of our decisions.
Twenty seven months after Nixon’s response he was encouraged out of office and succeeded by Gerald Ford.
One hundred twenty three days later the National Security Study Memorandum 200 otherwise recognized as the Kissinger Report was released, though not for public consumption; it was classified and shared only with those who had a need to know.
Seven days later Nelson Rockefeller assumed the role of Vice President.
I am still proud that my first ever vote was for President Nixon in 1972.