Skip to comments.
Boeing’s X-32 Stealth Fighter Had Just 1 Mission
National Security Journal ^
| 7/22/2025
| Steve Balestrieri
Posted on 07/22/2025 9:26:38 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111
The Boeing X-32, derided for its “ugly,” cartoonish appearance, was a formidable contender in the Joint Strike Fighter competition but ultimately lost to what became the F-35. Despite its superb handling qualities, which one test pilot compared to an F/A-18, the X-32’s downfall was its flawed and complex Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) design.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalsecurityjournal.org ...
TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: aviation; blogkaren; blogpimp; boeing; defense; flying; military; usairforce; usmilitary; x32
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
I don't think its ugly, for the record.
To: whyilovetexas111
That air intake, YIKES.
I'll take the X-36 ANY DAY:
2
posted on
07/22/2025 9:31:52 AM PDT
by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: whyilovetexas111
Despite its superb handling qualities, which one test pilot compared to an F/A-18, the X-32’s downfall was its flawed and complex Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) design. Every single war ever has shown that "complex" is never an advantage on the battlefield.
But it seems weapons are often designed for success in Northern Virginia MIC board rooms or the halls of Congress.
3
posted on
07/22/2025 9:32:00 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: PGR88
They wanted a jack-of-all-trades master-of-none jet.
To: whyilovetexas111
The people who had to make the decision did
5
posted on
07/22/2025 9:39:38 AM PDT
by
3RIVRS
To: whyilovetexas111
First time I saw this during the competition I knew it wouldn’t be chosen. It was just too damn stupid looking.
To: whyilovetexas111
No, not ugly. In fact, it looks happy!
7
posted on
07/22/2025 10:02:54 AM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
It was just too damn stupid looking. Well, like the man said, "You're taking it to war, not the prom".
8
posted on
07/22/2025 10:08:42 AM PDT
by
TangoLimaSierra
(⭐⭐To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Violence⭐⭐)
To: Alas Babylon!
It looks like a supersonic bathtub.
9
posted on
07/22/2025 10:11:15 AM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
To: CivilWarBrewing
That air intake, YIKES.The X-32 intake is not all that unusual. Been done many times.

F-86D intake.

F-8 intake.

A-7 intake.
10
posted on
07/22/2025 10:14:25 AM PDT
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(For 'tis the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard., -- Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4)
To: whyilovetexas111
The front view reminds me of a whale shark swimming through the water while gulping tons of algae. ;-)
To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
Oops! Plankton! I’m a dumb-ox! ;-)
To: CivilWarBrewing
That air intake, YIKES. AKA, the Monica...
13
posted on
07/22/2025 1:47:07 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Democrats: fake news, fake presidents, fake beliefs, fake policies, fake protesters & fake voters!)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
I think your A-7 and F-8 are bass ackwards.
14
posted on
07/22/2025 1:52:34 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Democrats: fake news, fake presidents, fake beliefs, fake policies, fake protesters & fake voters!)
To: null and void
“I think your A-7 and F-8 are bass ackwards.”
The F-8 looks correct.
The “A-7” looks like an F-8?
15
posted on
07/22/2025 2:04:42 PM PDT
by
TexasGator
(11/I1.here is no Sharknado system)
To: TexasGator
The sign at the static display says “F-8 Crusader”...
16
posted on
07/22/2025 2:22:30 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Democrats: fake news, fake presidents, fake beliefs, fake policies, fake protesters & fake voters!)
To: null and void
“The sign at the static display says “F-8 Crusader”...”
AI nails them both as F-8’s.
17
posted on
07/22/2025 2:31:38 PM PDT
by
TexasGator
(11/I1.here is no Sharknado system)
To: null and void
We referred to them as “maneaters”.
18
posted on
07/22/2025 2:33:37 PM PDT
by
TexasGator
(11/I1.here is no Sharknado system)
To: TexasGator
The strakes on the landing one also say F-8, but it looks too short to be the elegant F-8, to my eye it looks like a stubby A-7.
19
posted on
07/22/2025 2:40:52 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Democrats: fake news, fake presidents, fake beliefs, fake policies, fake protesters & fake voters!)
To: TexasGator
Upon closer inspection I agree with the AI, the A-7 at that angle would show the aerial refueling probe.
20
posted on
07/22/2025 2:52:26 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Democrats: fake news, fake presidents, fake beliefs, fake policies, fake protesters & fake voters!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson