Is the Truth about the Obama Birth Certificate about to Emerge?

ThePostEmail.com Newspaper ^ | 17 Jul 2025 | Sharon Rondeau

[CDR Kerchner]

Sheriff Arpaio created an important record for history of the only law enforcement investigation into Obama’s [forged] identify documents including Obama’s forged short-form birth certificate, the forged long-form birth certificate, the forged and back dated draft registration care, and Obama using a SSN from a deceased person from Connecticut. The article contains a lot of good historical information. I also have done the same. See http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org for that work. Those who forget history are bound to repeat it.

[joshua c]

no

you cant undo a presidency

but what about the people who perpetuated the fraud?

as clinton famously said

at this point what difference does it make?

well, mrs clinton, the difference is to prevent it from ever happening again

[Vermont Lt]

I thought Joe was dead. I guess he is still kicking.

Another person who should retire and go golfing.

[CDR Kerchner]

Under the birthright citizen laws in effect when Obama was born his mother was not old enough to pass along her U.S. Citizenship to Obama since Obama’s father was a foreign national.

[Macho MAGA Man]

Due to the laws at the time, she had to be 19. She was right at three months shy of confering US citizenship to him. He was born in August while her upcoming 19th birthday was in November.

[Vermont Lt]

Oh, there is an age limit on mom’s passing on Citizenship?

What color is the sky in your world?

[iontheball]

Waste of time. Got away with it.
____________________________
Doesn’t the Epstein cover-up now seem like deja vu? Just another government cover-up and the cases keep piling up. I foolishly thought Trump could break the deep state, but it’s clear now we are all captured sheep. Let this be a lesson to where the world is heading with AI.

[Texas Eagle]

What is there to know? Everybody concedes that his dad was Kenyan and his mother was American.

The only real question is: which nationality supercedes the other? Or is he of dual citizenship?

[Macho MAGA Man]

( I wonder what the minimum age for American mamas were expected to be when the founders wrote the Constitution.)

It didn’t matter back then. All offspring took the citizenship of their fathers.

[Macho MAGA Man]

(Oh, there is an age limit on mom’s passing on Citizenship?)

At the time of his Birth in 1961, yes!

[bigbob]

It emerged about six Photoshop versions ago.

[cuz1961]

And how can, as the lying media reported, can a rescue swimmer perform CPR in deep water ?

[cgbg]

Good post.

This is one of many “conspiracy theories” that I always believed was a “conspiracy fact”.

[butterdezillion]

This isn’t about Obama. This is about John Brennan who is now officially the subject of an FBI investigation of conspiracy. The question is how deep the fbi is willing to go. The stated subject of conspiracy is Russiagate, but that is the LEAST treasonous thing he’s done since 2007. If the fbi goes into the evidence of Dennis Montgomery they will be able to directly tie him to falsification of HI DOH database and FL voter registration database. Iowa, direct involvement in altering go to records to keep an ineligible ports in the white house ( a direct assault on the US constiruruon) and in election fraud in its test stage, which has been used to perpetrate the theft of the 2020 election. In addition, the role of Brennan and Clapper in using the supercomputer “,The Hammer” to get extortion mayerial against scores justices and other judges is also treason.

All of this is how the very rule of law has been subverted by the deep state, getting us to where we are now. I believe this nation cannot be healed until this is prosecuted and justice is seen by all the perpetrators a d enablers

The question is whether the fbi will go there
The evidence is there, low hanging fruit. But will they go there? That is the only question

I’m earnestly praying they will
If they won’t they have been lying to us about loving this country.

[GMMC0987]

I’ve often thought that bad fake birth certificate was an in your face move by Obama. Much like the travesty of the 2020 election with the 20 million missing voters.

[PIF]

Is this the one created in Abobe Acrobat?

[T.B. Yoits]

No standing...Statute of Limitations.

There's no statute of limitations on murder. Barack Obama was ineligible to serve as President of the United States and every individual killed in drone strikes and such is one count of murder. He had no authority to order the attacks.

[butterdezillion]

Dang. Autocorrect butchered that. Sigh. I hate using my phone.

S/b IOW dorect involvement in altering government records to keep an ineligible POTU# in thr White House

[Tell It Right]

Fine. So next question: Does a law passed by Congress (i.e. Naturalization Act of 1952) overwrite a clause in the Constitution (i.e. Article II Section 1 Clause 5's requirements for the President) without going through the amendment process? So at best we could argue that perhaps the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause may impact Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5.

I don't see a minimum age in Clause 5 for the future president's parents to confer citizenship onto the newborn. Was there one stated by the founders in other ways (i.e. federalist papers)? Or was there one in English common law at the time? If Yes to either one, then what was the minimum age? Or if No, then I have to conclude that the founders didn't intend for a minimum age for the parents to confer naturalized citizenship.

Either way, I don't see how a law passed by Congress can change the Constitution's requirements for President. Only an amendment process can do that. Think about how dangerous that is to let the 1952 act change the presidential requirements. Will we, therefore, let a future law completely change the presidential requirements (again without going through the amendment process)? Look at how much I want to honor the 14th amendment's "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" requirement for citizenship as it was originally meant, not how some law or judge tried to redefine it without the amendment process. By getting away from how it was originally intended, we have anchor babies galore.

[ClearCase_guy]

But will they go there?

It could be interesting fallout from the Epstein situation. For the record, I think the Epstein records have been mishandled, I'd like them to be released, I'm in that camp. But I worry that the Epstein situation will not be resolved to my liking, and maybe we will have to live with that.

But here has been a lot of backlash. A lot of unhappiness with Trump, Bondi, Patel, Bongino, etc. Rightly or wrongly there is anger and a sense of betrayal, and I think the administration is well aware of this.

Now, back to Obama and his birth certificate from over 60 years ago. Is the FBI going to really investigate this and the 2008 coverup? Or is Kash Patel's FBI and Pam Bondi's DOJ going to sweep all of this under the rug?

I think that if we see a second big cover-up in 2025 it's going to be a big problem. Maybe we have to let them slide on Epstein. But Obama, Brennan, and the others? Can we actually get somewhere this time? Please?