Posted on 07/17/2025 10:05:13 AM PDT by CDR Kerchner
(Jul. 16, 2025) — On June 18, former Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio began tweeting about the investigation his office opened into the “long-form” birth certificate image of then-sitting president Barack Hussein Obama II.
Arpaio launched the probe in August 2011 after a group of more than 200 constituents approached him with concerns that if the image, released on the White House website on April 27 proved to be fraudulent as several experts asserted, their votes in the 2012 presidential election would be disenfranchised. ... continue reading at: https://www.thepostemail.com/2025/07/16/is-the-truth-about-the-obama-birth-certificate-about-to-emerge/
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
”candidates” yes, the “President Elect”, no. Congress has this duty via the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three.
Yes, it is very easy if you take advantage of the fact that those who created it were quite careless. The author of your own link said this: "First, digital document analysis can detect manipulation, but it cannot determine whether the original subject is authentic."
Then, he goes on a wild goose chase regarding how PDF files are created without first examining what that particular PDF file was before it was created. That particular document is not a printed/scanned image that was then converted into a PDF file. It is a clipping mask that was created in Adobe Illustrator, and then output to a PDF file without being flattened into a final image. That is why you are able to deconstruct it back into all of its primary frames for examination. (Without digging out my notes, I seem to recall it had at least four mask layers, and not just two PDF layers as your reference indicated.) From there, you can easily see what components got edited, subtracted, or added from other sources. And, that particular clipping mask is full of surprises.
Without going into further detail, it all boils down to this: In August 1961, they did not have:
1) Typewriters that produced proportional spacing
2) Typewriters that produced kerned fonts
3) Computer word processing and publishing
4) Graphics editing software
5) computer disk/tape digital document storage
The Obama long form birth certificate is as fake as a three-dollar bill.
Each state runs their election. The are no Federal elections.
There were 50 chances to challenge this by the GOP—who did have standing.
They did not.
No one that mattered cared. No one that matters cares today.
The Twentieth Amendment, Section Three applies only to when the election is OVER. The states are eliminated from this portion of the process. It was NOT enforced.
So? Just because it was bundled with other software doesn't mean it automatically took on the name of "Photo Shop" as you mentioned earlier. It's Adobe Illustrator. And, that's what those who knew what they were doing were using to de-construct the document. And, not Photo Shop.
Jesus Christ, you people are pedantic.
That's funny coming from somebody who doesn't know what software they're working in.
How old are you? I expect this kind of silly crap on Reddit, not here among grown ups.
I'm obviously old enough to know more than you regarding the subject at hand. Were you even out of diapers in April 2011? Throughout this entire exchange, you've never asked me what I may have, or have seen, regarding proof of my claims. On the other hand, all I've seen out of you are mis-directed, baseless, narrow-minded rants.
Although, I will agree with you on one thing. Nobody cares, or cared. And, that's the way the deep state wants it.
I spent many years implementing electronic document management, and I downloaded the "birth certificate" from the White House web site when it first came out and analyzed it.
The fact that the author failed to "flatten" the image layers such that the signature and other key aspects could be moved around separately was all I needed to see.
But we all know this by now, don't we? Americans are willfully ignorant simply because acting on such knowledge takes us outside our comfort zones.
I noticed the same things as you did. Would it be plausible that the deep state were trolling us like a kitten and a ball of yarn by creating that fake PDF in such a manner that we would all just lick it up with excitement?
“The Obama birth certificate was debunked 10 minutes after it was made public online. In short, it was created using digital techniques that did not exist when he was born.”
That is clear to me. I created forms using desktop publishing software such as Aldus PageMaker. It’s only sensible to use layers when creating a form. Unfortunately, by the time I downloaded Obama’s certificate, I no longer had access to page layout software.
As far as I’m concerned, anyone who downloads his certificate, has page layout software, and then opens his birth certificate in layers has PROOF that it was not a valid birth certificate. Why doesn’t every news outlet report on this?
What evidence, Diogenes?
Did you find his Canadian birth certificate?
“you cant undo a presidency”
Probably not. However, de-legitimizing Barack Hussein Obama would provide a possibly lethal blow to liberal smugness.
“Either way, I don’t see how a law passed by Congress can change the Constitution’s requirements for President. Only an amendment process can do that.”
Your words make sense to me. Are arguments to the contrary sophistry? So, it would seem to me.
“It was a layered Adobe PDF.”
Case closed. It was a forged document.
I would think that every news organization, and many businesses, could reproduce your proof. They should speak up.
“One almost guaranteed coverup will be the Martin Luther King case. ... Imho there is a 90%+ likelihood that the FBI did the dirty.”
That could be true, yet those who have/had the information might not share it with the boss.
“You could deconstruct it with Adobe Illustrator at the time,”
Case closed.
Sorry, I didn’t see that this was an old thread.
There was a debate at the time as to whether Stanley Ann Dunham had gone to Canada and gave birth to Obama there. If Obama were born in Canada (outside of the 14th amendment jurisdiction), then different laws applied.
But you are correct that if Obama was born inside the United States, laws on parental right to confer citizenship wouldn't apply.
-PJ
No one cares.
We need to have a definite understanding of what it means to be an American citizen. The sloppy interpretations of the 14th Amendment have blurred this in the national consciousness. That, coupled with a deficient public education in civics and American history, has allowed someone like BO to slip through the cracks. Adding VP Kamala Harris to that list.
This is also addressed to all political parties who allow candidates who are not natural born citizens under Article II to run for the office of President. There is no excuse for this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.