Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia’s Admiral Kuznetsov Aircraft Carrier Could Soon Be ‘Scrap’
National Security Journal ^ | 7/14/2025 | Georgia Gilholy

Posted on 07/14/2025 9:32:40 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Thank god. This thing was a mess.
1 posted on 07/14/2025 9:32:40 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: delta7

Ping


2 posted on 07/14/2025 9:34:03 AM PDT by TexasGator (1i.. logo About Issues Projects Products Connect Subscribe Invest June 19, 2025 | Insight '1-1111 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Russia is broke. No money for a world class navy.


3 posted on 07/14/2025 9:36:13 AM PDT by TexasGator (1i.. logo About Issues Projects Products Connect Subscribe Invest June 19, 2025 | Insight '1-1111 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

No no. They should shove some more rubles into it. A real prestige item. It would be a least as effective as China’s barges... Er I mean flattops.


4 posted on 07/14/2025 9:41:39 AM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Submersible carriers are the next big thing in naval technology.

The Russians are just waaay ahead of the game!.................


5 posted on 07/14/2025 9:43:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Much like the Kaiser’s and Hitter’s Germany. Not much reason for a surface fleet; but they still fund submarines. Russia has never had a warm water port.

The Russian people seemed genetically predisposed to authoritarian leaders.


6 posted on 07/14/2025 9:46:18 AM PDT by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Japanese built a submersible carrier in WW2. It was a submarine with a large canister on its deck holding one or two seaplanes.


7 posted on 07/14/2025 9:50:01 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Much is often made of Russia having no force projection navy.

But it is generally not understood that the US has a vast network of bases around the world that require supply and suppor.

Russia does not have this. And thus they have only need for submarine nuclear missiles. No need for carriers or a large surface navy beyond that needed to protect the enormous oil and gas deposits in the Kara Sea — and that mostly needs ice breakers, not carriers.

China is building a huge navy but they have the same situation. They need only what they need to blockade oil from Taiwan. They will do show the flag missions around the world, but they have no bases to defend all over the world.

Probably beyond those realities is history pre 2010. The US Navy out of DESPERATION had to be vast, because US oil production was down to about 5 million bpd. It relentlessly fell to that level over decades. The Navy and carriers were needed to be sure tankers got from the Middle East to Houston’s refineries. Really, mostly that. The Navy grew and became a force projector primarily to secure oil supply.

Then interest rates went to zero and the oil known to exist in shale was suddenly affordable and has generated lots of oil output. But . . . the Permian guys now have said that party is about over. The Navy will again have to escort tankers.

But one thing is different now. China’s oil consumption has exploded to 16 million bpd, and KSA and OPEC (not +, just OPEC) won’t last forever and what it has will go to that voracious appetite in China, and India, to fill in whatever Russia isn’t sending.

This will mean a returning question . . . where will the US get its 19 million bpd of oil? These questions were prominent in the 2006 timeframe. The answer was not . . . from inside the US then because we were maxed out. And will be again.


8 posted on 07/14/2025 9:51:40 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Russia’s Black Sea Fleet was operated out of Crimea for hundreds of years. I think that’s considered a warm water port.


9 posted on 07/14/2025 9:53:28 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Owen

But they have nuclear tipped missiles that sometimes work.


10 posted on 07/14/2025 9:54:11 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Carriers are vulnerable to missiles, especially when they are pulled by a tug.


11 posted on 07/14/2025 9:55:29 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV

With today’s technology we could build a whole carrier for under water transport......................

1950’s they considered it:

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a25241538/submarine-aircraft-carrier-us-navy/


12 posted on 07/14/2025 9:56:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

I suppose those exist to defend the Kara Sea and Sakhalin’s vast oil and gas.

Make no mistake here. Oil is everything, and theirs will run out last.


13 posted on 07/14/2025 9:56:30 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111
Oh, no! I was hoping to get orders, too...

Here is a pic of the mighty dragon of the seas:

You note the handsome, ah, plume. The reason for it is that the ship runs (ran) on Mazut, a distillate so heavy that no other ship in the fleet used it. When she was at sea the Kuznetsov was accompanied by (1) a fleet tug, (2) an oiler, and (3) a destroyer, for towing as a result of frequent casualties, fuel that shipyards don't even sell, and, I suspect, a torpedo to put her out of her misery, respectively.

14 posted on 07/14/2025 9:57:08 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

“A retired Russian admiral even stated that classic aircraft carriers are “a thing of the past,” vulnerable to modern missiles.”

wow! ... can anyone say: “Sour Grapes”?


15 posted on 07/14/2025 9:57:40 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111
A retired Russian admiral even stated that classic aircraft carriers are “a thing of the past,” vulnerable to modern missiles.

I am guessing laser defenses could change that.

16 posted on 07/14/2025 9:58:20 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

“A retired Russian admiral even stated that classic aircraft carriers are “a thing of the past,” vulnerable to modern missiles.”

the admiral went on to say: “We doan need no stinkin’ aircraft carriers.”


17 posted on 07/14/2025 9:58:38 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
Carriers are vulnerable to missiles, especially when they are pulled by a tug.

Russia's carrier will be retired, but the tugs will remain in the fleet to service Russia's other garbage scows.
18 posted on 07/14/2025 9:59:58 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

One aircraft carrier... And people are still oddly perplexed as to why the Commies lost the cold war??? Doh!

They likely did and still do under dictator Putin spend most of the military budget on Vodka for the cannon fodder... It’s so much easer to send people into certain death when they’re drunk on Vodka.


19 posted on 07/14/2025 10:00:22 AM PDT by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Western Canada has more oil than anything else. It’s also renewable. We’re not going to run out. The big navies aren’t necessary unless it’s force projection into some country.


20 posted on 07/14/2025 10:00:31 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson