Posted on 07/12/2025 11:40:55 AM PDT by mononymous
And what the truth is (IMO), is what I explained here The "Great Reset" That Is Needed, three+ years ago. In essence, Epstein weaved a web, and numerous “elites” have been caught in it; think of the material on Hunter Biden’s laptop, and multiply it by 100s. There likely isn’t a formal “list,” there doesn’t need to be one, all of the “right” people know who else is on the list, and somewhere, at the apex of all of this, is some unknown entity or entities that is the gatekeeper for the compromising information that’s been stored/archived in various media formats. Who (or what) is most likely to have this evidence? I suspect we all know the answer. Is it possible that some, or all of it, have been destroyed? Of course; think of what the FBI reportedly did with Hillary’s hard drives. However, if this is indeed what has happened, one would think that instead of being given the inconsistent bull$hit coming out of the White House, and DOJ/FBI, we’d just be told that 1. the evidence was destroyed, and 2. there’s an investigation as to who, when, how, and why. End of story, right?
Now, if I were Ka-ching Patel, or Danny-boy Bongino, I’d be leaking any and all related info that I have on this; yes, I’d leak it, and not to the media, but to an uncompromised member of the House or Senate so that he/she, can expose the info, on the record, in the related chamber, per my three+ years ago suggestion. (I know this assumes there’s an “uncompromised member” of Congress.) There’s one exception I’ll make to this potential leak, I’d have to be given a full briefing from the President himself, understand his strategy/thinking, and assess whether or not this nation’s security will be compromised as a result. In theory, however, information is fed in the opposite direction, and so, Messrs. Patel, and Bongino, should KNOW why the information cannot be released, and if the info cannot be released, then 1. they should refuse to make any further comments on the matter, but more importantly, 2. the fact that Epstein’s activities have anything to do with national security, is, on its face, an admission that he was an intelligence asset; why would the IC employ the services of a known sexual predator?
But as Patel, or Bongino, I’d go further than the above, I’d request that one of my underlings study the FBI files of people like Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, Jamie Raskin, Dan Goldman, every member of the Senate committee who did nothing after Brennan spied on them, etc., etc. Some may say that this will be an illegal order; I’ll disagree, because I’ll predicate this “preliminary” investigation on the suspicion that all of these people are being blackmailed. And if I thought that it’d simply be better, I’d do this exercise myself, starting on my first day in office. The way I see it, “leverage” can work in two ways, the first is called blackmail, normally used to extract certain concessions from a person, the second is, “encouragement” as in, “I’ll encourage you to not run for re-election because there might be a leak of something you don’t want people to know…”
If none of the above happens, The Swamp will thrive, and the representative republic? Only as a pure farce.
I’d say you’ve missed most of what happened, what is happening and what shall happen.
I think we are all patsies. And rubes.
It’s okay though. Your ignorance is your teacher.
Another thing to be aware of is that your desire to malign Patel and Bongino establishes itself as an independent agenda with no value to your main purpose.
“I think we are all patsies. And rubes”
I think you’re referring to all the deep state infiltrators on this website.
This is a video of Patel, Bongino and Bondi in their own words.
It is worth your time.
A major aspect of my message is that what we can see is only the superficial part.
The best way to handle this is not to intensify our focus on surface details, but instead try to figure out what’s beneath the surface.
All I am asking you to do is listen to Bondi, Kash and Bongino in their own words.
They should be heard—and understood.
But that’s only about 11 percent of it.
Explain what is happening, the, what has happened and what will happen, s’il vous plait.
Concisely, in simple language for us simple folk.
You can’t. This is a simple coverup.
I’ll give you a hint.
In life there are things that happen to us, and there are things that we make happen. Trump is using the Epstein case to his advantage. You will see this if you look in the right places.
You want to make sure you have mastered the details of the “11 percent” because details matter.
Without that it is hard to reach reasonable analysis of the rest of it.
But the 89 percent makes the 11 irrelevant.
We will have to disagree about that.
In the Watergate case the CIA set up Nixon.
It was very difficult to figure out how they did it without mastering a lot of details of the case.
Not me. Although I can’t promote my way as worth imitating.
In the 4th grade the teacher said “You are a cynic.”
I didn’t give it any thought until in my early 20s a young woman said: “That’s sad.”
She was right.
I so wish I were wrong but all my life people later, sometimes years later, have come up to me and said “You know what? You were right.”
The CIA-run media did with Watergate exactly what you want to do here.
They used the fake details to cover up what really happened.
The Washington Post (Katherine Graham) was/is a CIA asset.
Eh?
Here are some of the Watergate details that mattered:
—The original Watergate break-in involved several CIA agents
—One of them left tape on the door to make sure they were caught
—Nixon never authorized the Watergate break in—CIA agents did
—The Ellsberg break in was intentionally botched by a CIA agent
—The White House taping system was run by a CIA agent
—The CIA waited for Nixon to ask them to help bail him out—instead they taped him and testified against him
etc etc etc
“I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.