Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China’s New J-20A Stealth Fighter Has Just 1 Mission
National Security Journal ^ | 7/7/2025 | Andrew Latham

Posted on 07/07/2025 5:17:39 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

China’s J-20A “Mighty Dragon” represents a significant leap in the country’s military aviation, a fifth-generation stealth fighter designed to challenge Western air dominance. On paper, it boasts an impressive suite of features, including a low radar cross-section, advanced avionics, and a versatile weapons payload. However, significant questions remain about its real-world combat effectiveness.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalsecurityjournal.org ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: airforce; andrewlatham; brics; ccp; china; defense; j20a; losers; mightydragon; military; multiplenicks; stealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
China has not fought a war since 1979. Full stop.
1 posted on 07/07/2025 5:17:39 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Given the one child policy, I wonder how many family lines will be forever gone in any large-scale military conflict. I can’t imagine that will foster a fight-to-the-end spirit in their armed forces.


2 posted on 07/07/2025 5:38:15 AM PDT by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Such a pathetically written piece I got tired of trying to fight meaning out of it.


3 posted on 07/07/2025 5:40:42 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

And, as I recall, the 1979 war was a brief incursion into Vietnam — and they got their butts kicked.

For a culture that loves to throw around the term “paper tiger”, there is a good chance that their military IS a paper tiger.


4 posted on 07/07/2025 5:40:49 AM PDT by rbg81 (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Interesting though that the statement “However, significant questions remain about its real-world combat effectiveness” reminds one of the statement “Initial Dominance vs. Later Vulnerabilities: The Zero was incredibly dominant in the early years of the war (1940-1942) due to its superior maneuverability, range, and the high skill of Japanese pilots. However, its design prioritized these qualities by sacrificing pilot protection and self-sealing fuel tanks.” Before the war, the US vastly underestimated the combat effectiveness of the Japanese Zero and were hammered in dogfights. They eventually learned how to fight them. I worry that we are underestimating the Chinese 5th Generation Fighters.


5 posted on 07/07/2025 5:42:29 AM PDT by silent majority rising (When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Agree. Russia took years to get their feet under them and they are probably one of the most effective war fighters NOW….a few hundred thousand(million?) deaths later. Not to mention Israel took out Russia air defences in Iran in a few weekends.


6 posted on 07/07/2025 5:45:18 AM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

“China has not fought a war since 1979. Full stop.”

Thoughout their history....through 3,000+ years...unless they are fighting each other, or a tiny neighboring country.....their win ratio is close to zero.


7 posted on 07/07/2025 6:13:18 AM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

I read it, and still don’t know the one mission it was built for.

Plus to say this “although the Raptor is no match at all when going up against an adversary in combat” is just stupid.


8 posted on 07/07/2025 6:23:50 AM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PTBAA

IMHO an army of “one child” soldiers, unproven equipment and the Russian debacle in Ukraine all dissuaded Xi from attacking Taiwan. Xi realized that a full scale, resisted attack across 90 miles of open ocean was not only likely to fail but the casualties would be huge. The loss of those soldiers would create a political crisis within China. It would have gone very bad for Xi, his family, and syncophants. The military would have been humiliated and would have blamed “corruption” for the catastophre. In fact Xi probably feared a military coup and the overthrow of the communist party.


9 posted on 07/07/2025 6:26:18 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

“I read it, and still don’t know the one mission it was built for.”

It’s in there — it says “to beat America.”


10 posted on 07/07/2025 6:27:53 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Is the J-20A the one that has to fly attached to refueling 100% of the time ? LOl


11 posted on 07/07/2025 6:28:02 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/satellite-imagery-shows-ukraine-attack-destroyed-damaged-russian-bombers-2025-06-03/

Is it stealthy from above?


12 posted on 07/07/2025 7:01:08 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

A lot depends on the quality of its missiles.


13 posted on 07/07/2025 7:02:14 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Well duh.

PACOM is well aware of the aircraft but more concerned with its missile payload.


14 posted on 07/07/2025 7:16:58 AM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: odawg

I thought so too. Gave up. These people must get paid by the word and like youse tube by the minute of repetitive content.


15 posted on 07/07/2025 7:17:13 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Donald John Trump. First man to be Elected to the Presidency THREE times since FDR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: odawg
Such a pathetically written piece

Indeed, a gigantic nothing-burger with zero information. It reads like something Kamala Harris might have written if she could write.

16 posted on 07/07/2025 7:18:48 AM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

I tried to find what the ‘one mission’ was but was unsuccessful.


17 posted on 07/07/2025 7:38:17 AM PDT by Doctor Congo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

[China’s New J-20A Stealth Fighter Has Just 1 Mission]

“Not getting shot down is Job One!”


18 posted on 07/07/2025 7:46:28 AM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too. 😁 " - Robert Conquest )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

“Such a pathetically written piece I got tired of trying to fight meaning out of it.”

That’s because it didn’t say anything.


19 posted on 07/07/2025 8:10:45 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising
Before the war, the US vastly underestimated the combat effectiveness of the Japanese Zero and were hammered in dogfights. They eventually learned how to fight them. I worry that we are underestimating the Chinese 5th Generation Fighters.

Couple that with the low numbers of F-22s available. Something like 25 may have to take on the whole PRC air force on short notice. Those odds don't favor quality over quantity.

20 posted on 07/07/2025 8:22:42 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson