Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amy Coney Barrett NUKES Ketanji Brown Jackson FROM ORBIT In Her Majority Opinion on Universal Injunctions
Twitchy ^ | Sam J.

Posted on 06/27/2025 3:51:47 PM PDT by NoLibZone

As Twitchy readers know, the Supreme Court ruled against activist federal judges standing in the way of the Trump administration.

What you all may not know is just how badly Amy Coney Barrett NUKED Ketanji Brown Jackson.

"“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”

In other words, Ketanji is too dumb to even bother with.

Okay, that's going to leave a mark.

Oooh, the her usage of 'imperial' is pretty damn brilliant.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: amyconeybarrett; ketanjijackson; prettybrilliant

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 06/27/2025 3:51:47 PM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
ACB delivered the judicial temperment version of

"Jane, you ignorant slut..."

2 posted on 06/27/2025 3:53:59 PM PDT by lightman (Beat the Philly fraud machine the Amish did onest, ja? Nein, zweimal they did already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I am thinking that there must have been a cat fight between ACB and her sorority sisters at the court. ACB Got mad and decided to teach them a lesson by actually making some good rulings.


3 posted on 06/27/2025 3:56:41 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Heard today- the ruling just delays the verdict until monday when the three dissenters on the SC will re-present the issue to the court and try to make their case- if so- this isn’t finalized yet, but I doubt the three can make their case- it’s pretty clear they are on the wrong side of the issue per usual


4 posted on 06/27/2025 3:57:20 PM PDT by Bob434 (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Also ties into the recent “no kings” stuff, to which Djt responded “thank you, there are still no kings “


5 posted on 06/27/2025 3:59:00 PM PDT by C210N (Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

It sounds like ACB is getting fed up with her stupid liberal colleague who can’t even define what a woman is.


6 posted on 06/27/2025 4:06:23 PM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Maybe that happened. We never know what happens behind the scenes.

But I know there’s been so much speculation, how Amy Coney Barrett wanted to fit in with the girls, etc. And that her wanting to be accepted by the liberal women on the court, made her issue some less than conservative rulings.

And of course, I don’t read and pick apart every single Supreme Court decision. But I never recall hearing how one justice directly criticized another justice’s opinion by name. Maybe there is something personal going on behind the scenes.


7 posted on 06/27/2025 4:07:21 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revel

The thing is, before publication the various opinions are circulated to all the Justices. And Jackson stuck to her guns. She didn’t moderate. That is dumbfounding.


8 posted on 06/27/2025 4:08:39 PM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Another testimonial to the subpar work of RINOS like Collins, Murkowski, and Romney in the US Senate. These fools voted to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson to a lifetime position on the SCOTUS.

The final vote on the nomination was 53-47.


9 posted on 06/27/2025 4:11:57 PM PDT by PBRCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Dems are still seething over losing and are unable go cope with the Court deciding, “No. You cannot have your district court judges protect your open borders agenda.”
Every order by the inferior federal court judges these past five months blocking the executive branch has been transparently political.


10 posted on 06/27/2025 4:24:35 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Heard today- the ruling just delays the verdict until monday when the three dissenters on the SC will re-present the issue to the court and try to make their case- if so- this isn’t finalized yet, but I doubt the three can make their case- it’s pretty clear they are on the wrong side of the issue per usual

I've never heard of SCOTUS rehearing a case after they release their ruling opinion and dissent. I believe today was the last day of this session. They don't come back until October. So KBJ is going to have to take the L and stew. She'll probably make some nasty comments in articles and speeches.

11 posted on 06/27/2025 4:26:51 PM PDT by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
KBJ is a DEI idiot. She should resign so real legally-adept humans can replace her—regardless of their color.
12 posted on 06/27/2025 4:27:14 PM PDT by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Thanks Joe.


13 posted on 06/27/2025 4:30:38 PM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Obviously false.
14 posted on 06/27/2025 4:39:31 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

ACB gets a lot of scorn, but do remember she was mentored by Scalia, which has got to have some lasting impact.


15 posted on 06/27/2025 4:49:33 PM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maro
."..before publication the various opinions are circulated to all the Justices. And Jackson stuck to her guns. She didn’t moderate. That is dumbfounding."

I had not thought about that. ACB essentially wrote that Jackson is too stupid to be on SCOTUS and Jackson saw that in advance, but didn't change her dissent. Which, I suppose, further reinforces ACB's opinion.

16 posted on 06/27/2025 4:55:52 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

She blowed up real good.


17 posted on 06/27/2025 4:57:44 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I hope so-


18 posted on 06/27/2025 4:59:50 PM PDT by Bob434 (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ETCM

could be- Here is the case from polutico- can’t find the one i heard earlier, but it said about the same thing I heard from conservative site-

“Supreme Court leaves open the question of nationwide injunctions when states sue.

The CASA ruling leaves room for judges to order relief akin to a nationwide injunction when a state sues the federal government.”

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/06/27/supreme-court-rulings-decisions-today-news-analysis/nationwide-injunction-state-lawsuits-00427992


19 posted on 06/27/2025 5:07:46 PM PDT by Bob434 (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revel

lets hope shes like most women and can remember and hold a grudge forever.. I have been married 20 years now and she still reminds me of my screw ups 19.9 years ago (and no. marrying her isn’t one of them... yes.. shes in the room with me)


20 posted on 06/27/2025 5:11:55 PM PDT by cableguymn (Can't cancel all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson