Posted on 05/02/2025 8:08:31 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Laura Loomer @LauraLoomer
Why did President @realDonaldTrump nominate a Democrat to the #3 top position at the DOJ whose wife helped paint the Black Lives Matter mural outside the White House?
Stanley Woodward, Trump’s nominee for Associate Attorney General, has donated to @BarackObama 15 times and is married to Kristin McGough, a far-left DC lawyer who testified in defense of BLM rioters and claimed the DC criminal code was “racist.” She also sued President Trump in 2020 on behalf of Black Lives Matter.
Kristin McGough uses pronouns in her bio. She supports kneeling for George Floyd. And she supported the prosecution of J6ers.
Trump supporters want justice, not sabotage. Why are we putting this progressive couple anywhere near the Trump DOJ?
9:35 AM · May 2, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Trump knows that Loomer is on his side. If she is raising something he should absolutely take it into consideration
All excellent questions?
I’d like to see some answers, and not next month!!!!!!!
Why did he nominate a bunch of SCOTUS who were moderates?
Not one Scalia or Bork in the whole lot.
I don’t know why Loomer isn’t in the White House screening all nominees. She seems to have the goods.
Loomer has been on fire.
I salute her for her efforts.
Me too.
Yep.
Read up on the guy:
Notable clients of Woodward include:
Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs — he was convicted of seditious conspiracy for his role in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol (Meggs was sentenced to 12 years in prison).[6]
Longtime Donald Trump aide Dan Scavino, whom Woodward represented in fighting a subpoena from the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack.[6][15]
Ex-Trump aide Kash Patel, whom Woodward represented in connection with Patel’s grand jury appearance related to Trump’s retention of classified documents and national defense-related documents after his presidency.[6]
Not everyone who does something weird is compromised, threatened, blackmailed, etc. I love and greatly admire our Pres., but he has been known to pick people before who turn out later to be losers.
He may very well have made that particular pick for the purpose of exposing him, but I think we also have to be careful to avoid using that reason as an all-purpose, catchall excuse for everything.
Yea.
Trump will get right on that for ya.😂
Lol!
Loomer. The next Ann Coulter for y’all.
If anyone make bad picks it the majority of folks on this site.
Trump
👍
Trump doesn’t know the history of every person in Washington. Trump’s AIDES are supposed to know. Whoever recommended this person is the one who should be booted, along with the nominee.
AND he should fire anyone who recommended this guy for #3.
“Why did he nominate a bunch of SCOTUS who were moderates?”
He did the best he could. He nominated them because McConnell would not advance a nominee not on his list. McConnell recessed for Obama, but for Trump he lept the Senate in session for the entire Trump Presidency to prevent recess appointments (And yes, a Supreme can and has been appointed at recess)
Between the Russia hoax, impeachments, mutiny in the military leadership, CIA placing spies inside his White House, and the fact that his AG and FBI leaders were cemented in place with McConnell and Graham impeachent threats...no, he did not have the freedom to nominate anyone he wanted.
Back of the envelope, I think first term Trump had about 33% of the power a President normally has.
“”Why did he nominate a bunch of SCOTUS who were moderates?
Not one Scalia or Bork in the whole lot.””
As I recall.... at the time.... we, on the right, also thought that his picks were good ones. There was no real pushback on any of Trump’s SCOTUS choices.
Even some of the nominees that looked good turned out to be losers (or worse) or got “fired” or quit (apparently President Trump isn’t the easiest boss to work with?)
The shame of it is that there are plenty of well-qualified, capable people “out here” that would welcome the opportunity, the public service of helping President Trump fix some of the broken-down things in America. Unfortunately, you pretty much have to have a high public profile to even be noticed (and many of THOSE people didn’t achieve their fame and fortunes in the nicest or most honest ways — so the odds aren’t great that they’ll turn out well in a genuinely-public service position)........
and then there are some who “seize their 15 minutes of fame” by embarrassing President Trump or insulting him on their way out the door.
These seem to be inherent problems in the appointments system. It isn’t clear how they can be fixed?
Lawyer for Many in Trump’s Orbit Is Picked for No. 3 Post at Justice Dept.
If confirmed, Stanley Woodward would join a number of other former lawyers for President Trump who have been selected to key law enforcement positions.
His clients have included those subpoenaed or convicted for the January 6 United States Capitol attack, and aides to Donald Trump.
> It isn’t clear how they can be fixed?
Throw a ball into the crowd at a Trump rally and appoint the person who catches it. I’m not even joking.
BEYOND PSTUPID ! FIRE HIM TODAY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.