Posted on 04/23/2025 9:02:51 PM PDT by Red Badger
It’s hard to find suits in XXXL size...............
I find it exceedingly strange how pro Israel fetterman is. Disturbingly so. And hell no on bombing them. If israel wants it they can do it. No more tail wagging the dog.
And a fleece lining. :)
Why didn’t this moron say that to Biden?
Do “Big & Tall” shops exist anymore?
Haven’t seen one in years. Maybe in the big cities.................
Bide wouldn’t know who he was...................
Iran has fine engineers and physicists and mathematicians that are quite capable of making an atomic bomb and perhaps a thermonuclear bomb with North Korean bomb technology from North Korea and Pakistan. This is stolen technology from the USA but a different subject.
In reality they have the atomic bomb and probably the thermonuclear bomb courtesy of North Korea.
That is the grim reality and must be addressed as the grim realli9ty it is. The choices are bad and worse.
.
I myself do not believe that the Iranians have Thermo. Nevertheless, they have the potential for massive destruction even with a non thermonuclear weapon.
Quite frankly, my opinion is that there is no alternative but to attack and Destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities. Should Iran actually stage an attack, the retaliation would kill hundreds of thousands of Iranian people, with whom we have no quarrel. That would be an immense tragedy.
It’s a world gone mad when the crazy man is sane.
Source: Jewish Insider
By Marc Rod
April 16, 2025
Israeli strikes scuttled; Trump rejected Israeli plan for
striking Iranian nuclear program: Jewish Insider report
The president reportedly chose to pursue talks with Iran over supporting Israeli strikes and told Israeli officials he would not back them while negotiations are ongoing
Faced with fault lines inside his own administration over Iran policy, President Donald Trump rejected an Israeli plan, which would have required American backing and potential U.S. involvement, to strike Iran’s nuclear program as soon as May, The New York Times reported on Wednesday.
The Times reported that Trump chose instead to pursue diplomatic talks with Iran, which began last Saturday and have fueled concerns among Iran hawks in both the U.S. and Israel that the U.S. may make concessions on key issues that would allow Iran to retain some of its nuclear program. He reportedly told Israeli officials he would not back a military strike while talks are ongoing.
NEW YORK TIMES — Israel had planned to strike Iranian nuclear sites as soon as next month but was waved off by President Trump in recent weeks in favor of negotiating a deal with Tehran to limit its nuclear program, according to administration officials and others briefed on the discussions.
Israeli officials had recently developed plans to attack Iranian nuclear sites in May. They were prepared to carry them out, and at times were optimistic that the United States would sign off. The goal of the proposals, according to officials briefed on them, was to set back Tehran’s ability to develop a nuclear weapon by a year or more.
Almost all of the plans would have required U.S. help not just defend Israel from Iranian retaliation, but also to ensure that an Israeli attack was successful, making the United States a central part of the attack itself.
For now, Mr. Trump has chosen diplomacy over military action. In his first term, he tore up the Iran nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama administration. But in his second term, eager to avoid being sucked into another war in the Middle East, he has opened negotiations with Tehran, giving it a deadline of just a few months to negotiate a deal over its nuclear program.
NY Times-—Israeli officials had their own plans to attack Iranian nuclear sites, back in May.
They were all prepared to carry them out, and were sure the United States would sign off.
Israeli plans would have required US help not just to defend Israel from Iranian retaliation, but also ......to finance...... and ensure that an Israeli attack was successful....... making the United States a central part of the attack itself.
Fetterman visited Israel to show his support just recently.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I must say that I agree with Fetterman on this issue. I believe that Mark Levin is in this same camp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.